Laserfiche WebLink
�� O -JASON A. TOST�, RCE 77353 <br /> PROPOSED STRUCTURE ENGINEER OF RECORD <br /> EXISTING STRUCTURE <br /> LOADING CRITERIA <br /> ROOF DEAD LOAD, 7 PSF rROOF <br /> @.1� GARY (1 PSF SHEATHING) <br /> THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY APPROX, PROPERTY LINE APPROX, 0 PSF PURLINS) <br /> INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS PROPERTY (5 PSF FUTURE= SOLAR) <br /> BASED UPON SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY G.I.S. LINE ROOF LIVE LOAD, 2t7 PSF (W/ REDUCTIQNS) <br /> DATA, AND WAS REFERENCED UNDER THE FLOOR DEAD LOAD: N/A <br /> DIRECTION OF TIM ODOM, PLS 8468, FLOOR LIVE LOAD: N/A <br /> l <br /> l ND LOADING: <br /> SIIE PLAN NOIEs ° -H ; ULT. DESIGN ENCLOSE <br /> ar l WND SPEED 110 MPH <br /> 1, THIS DRAWING IS FOR EXHIBIT PURPOSES APN RISK CATEGORY If V <br /> L Pf <br /> ONLY AND DOES NOT REPRESENT ANY ���-190_x17 WIND EXPOSURE C LOSEILEGAL SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. INTERNAL PRESSURE*2. ALL FEATURES ARE EXISTING UNLESS 20 ACRES COEFFICIENT 0.18 UP S <br /> NOTED OTHERWISE AS PROPOSED. C&C VELOCITY LOW HAS <br /> 3. APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS ARE PRESENTED <br /> PRESSURES 25 PSF <br /> FOR UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND SEISMIC LOADING: RISK CATI <br /> FACILITIES, <br /> RISK CATEGORY II ALLOWED <br /> SEISMIC IMPORTANCE CBC TAR <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY �� FACTOR 1'00 <br /> SPECTRAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT 0�0 � COEFFI ENT S3 ONSE 0,904 PROPOSE[ <br /> 1868 E. HAZELTON AV�, <br /> STOCKTON CA 95209; ��,11 EXISTING SEPTIC COEFFICIENT CENT 0 SPECTRAL SPONSE 0.330 FIRE SPRI <br /> (209)468-3420 < SPECTRAL RESPONSE <br /> PROPOSAL APPROVED SUBJECT TCS' �,, � ,�: .v L � i;APPROX. LOCATION) COEFFICIENT Sps 0.686 FIRE RE51! <br /> ' SPECTRAL RESPONSE PER CBC <br /> ( OBTAIN SANITATION PERMIT" SPCTRACOEFFICIENT Soy 0.383 <br /> © OBTAIN WELLIPMP PERMIT POOL W/ 36,000 GALLONS WATER SITE CLASS D FIRE RES)` <br /> a CONDITIONS NOTED BELOW STORAGE FOR FIRE SUPPRESSION <br /> SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY D FOR EXTE( <br /> REMARKS + i w�� , SEISMIC FORCE MOMENT RESISTING FRAMES PER C8GF7 Te— ' <br /> d 6C :, t \I', -- <br /> ATlO I`' F' .,;' I RESISTING SYSTEM ORDINARY STEEL MOMENT FRAME <br /> gv"`a nd (_ � ov �. g�. �. WINE STORAGE BLDG. AND BRACED FRAMETYPE O <br /> .,, �; �L J tSEISMIC RESPONSEF <br /> fE _ COEFFICIENT Ce SEISMIC D <br /> Date - ay ' 485l�f r I ! -_....,� ; RESPONSE MODIFICATION <br /> 0.196w <br /> Approval extends only to that w !ch is shown and d -- ! 69'f FACTOR R <br /> 15 <br /> hereon and does not authorize or approve any gmisslon or I t ANALYSIS PROCEDURE EQUIVALENT LATERAL BUILDING <br /> deviation from requirements of state laws or local oldinances. <br /> �£ _._ . REDUNDANCY FACTO FORCE PROCEDURE <br /> SEE SITE 1.3 ALLOWED <br /> W <br /> EXISTING SEPTIC RESIDENCE ' , CBC TABL <br /> � (APPROx. LOCATION} -r°° 27 t PLAN (LEFT) SOILS: <br /> OCCUPANT <br /> ILL! I ' f ' rI ..,.- I f SOIL BEARING CAPACITY CPC TABLE <br /> ASSUMED PER CHC <br /> o ' I TABLE 1806.2 1500 PSF <br /> �' r.z_.. I OCCUPANT <br /> ' I N/A 300 SQ.FT <br /> EXISTING DOMESTIC WELL MAX EXIT <br /> ..... <br /> -_. . <br /> l ' CBC TABLE <br /> - <br /> i EXISTING PROPANE TAI <br /> ED STRUCTURE <br /> l NK PROPOSED <br /> ONE EXIT P <br /> � _ �j � Two EXITS <br /> G'p ALLOWED C <br /> F--! <br /> TRAVEL PER <br /> ACCEsslalLf <br /> ! > a, ENTRANCE, <br /> Isting andVI ' <br /> APPROX. R/W I I <br />