Laserfiche WebLink
Rev date: 5/6/16 <br />Attachment 2. LLN L Violation Tracking Spreadsheet - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act (APSA) <br />Inspection Date: September - October 2015 <br />LLNL Site 300 <br />Violation Report <br />Regulation/Code <br />Remarks <br />Inspection Report Action Item <br />Status <br />Item it <br />Violation Class <br />st <br />f� <br />615 <br />CFR 112.7(f)(2) <br />FAILED TO DESIGNATE A PERSON ACCOUNTABLE FOR DISCHARGE PREVENTION <br />to <br />I <br />Class II <br />(r <br />CFR 112.7(f)(2) Failed to designate a person accountable for discharge prevention. This facilitydoes not have a designated person for discharge <br />The sitewide SPCC Plan will include an individual's or individuals' <br />Violation ackowledged. <br />prevention. The SPCC Plan for building 801 states that the designated person is the "Operations Facility Manager" but does not specify a specific <br />names that are accountable for discharge prevention. <br />person by name. The Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan shall designate a person at the facility who is accountable for <br />Sitewide SPCC Plan completed May 4, 2016. <br />discharge prevention and who reports to facility management. Immediately designate a person to be accountable for discharge prevention and <br />Plan includes all individuals' names that are <br />update the SPCC Plan to include this information, <br />accountable for discharge prevention. <br />617 <br />CFR 112.7(g) <br />PLAN FAILED TO ADDRESS SECURITY OF SITE AND VALVES, LOCK OUT/TAG OUT, AND LIGHTING <br />Class II <br />CFR 112.7(g) Plan failed to address security of site and valves , lock out/tag out, and lighting. <br />The sitewide SPCC Plan will include a description of lighting in <br />Violation ackowledged. <br />The Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan did not include a complete discussion of security lighting. The SPCC Plan for building <br />the context of vandalism and assisting in the discovery of oil <br />801 discussed the lighting provided for tank transfer I fuel delivery operations, but did not address vandalism prevention or discharge discovery. <br />discharges. <br />Sitewide SPCC Plan completed May 4, 2016. <br />The SPCC Plan must include descriptions of how you secure and control access to the oil handling, processing & storage areas, secure master flow <br />Plan includes a description of lighting in the <br />& drain valves, prevent unauthorized access to starter controls on oil pumps, secure out -of -service and loading/unloading connections of oil <br />context of vandalism and assisting in the <br />pipelines, and address the appropriateness of security lighting to both prevent acts of vandalism and assist in the discovery of oil discharges. <br />discovery of oil discharges. <br />Immediately update the SPCC Plan to Include all of the required security Information, or provide equivalence as allowed by 40 CFR 112.7(.)(2) . <br />713 <br />CFR 112.8(c)(6) <br />FAILTO PERFORM SCHEDULED TANK TESTS AND INSPECTIONS BY APPROPRIATELY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL <br />Class II <br />CFR 112.8(c)(6) Failed to perform scheduled tank tests and inspections by appropriately qualified personnel. The Diala oil tank for building 801 was <br />The sitewide SPCC Plan will clearly define at what point integrity <br />Violation ackowledged. <br />not tested for integrity. According to the SPCC Plan, visual inspections will be used for integrity testing unless problems are detected. The monthly <br />testing is required if there is an indication of an issue with a <br />tank inspection records being maintained by Mr. Tom McWilliams (the building APSA "operator") have marked for many months that there is liquid <br />piece of equipment. These decision points should be clearly <br />Sitewide SPCC Plan completed May 4, 2016. <br />visible in the secondary containment or berm and that the exterior coating is bubbling, cracked, or damaged. When questioned about what kind of <br />defined and based on the judgment of the PE. <br />Plan clearly defines at what point integrity <br />"problems" noted during the monthly inspections would trigger additional integrity testing , Mr. McWilliams stated that he monitors the tank <br />testing is required if there is an indication of <br />inventory levels and would take action If the levels Indicated a loss of product. Each aboveground container shall be tested and inspected for <br />an issue with a piece of equipment. <br />Integrity on a regular schedule and whenever r repairs are made. The qualifications of personnel performing tests and Inspections, frequency and <br />type of testing and inspections that take into account container size, configuration , and design shall be determined in accordance with industry <br />standards. Examples of these integrity tests include, but are not limited to: visual Inspection, hydrostatic testing, radiographic testing, ultrasonic <br />testing, acoustic emissions testing, or other systems of non-destructive testing. Comparison records and other records of inspections and tests <br />must be maintained on site. Immediately conduct the necessary testing and submit a copy of the test results to the EHD, or provide equivalence as <br />allowed by CFR 112.7(a)(2). <br />717 <br />CFR 112.8(c)(8)(v) <br />FAILED TO REGULARLY TEST LIQUID LEVEL SENSING DEVICES TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATION <br />Class II <br />CFR 112.8(c)(8)(v) Failed to regularly test liquid level sensing devices to ensure proper operation. Liquid level sensing devices have not been tested. <br />The sitewide SPCC Plan will identify what overfill prevention <br />Violation ackowledged. <br />According to Mr. Tom McWilliams, the APSA "operator" at building 801, the liquid level sensing devices are looked at for determining inventory <br />method is used for each container. Sensing devices must be <br />levels, but are not tested or checked for accuracy. Procedures and frequency of testing for these devices were not addressed in the Spill <br />tested as per manufacturer's recommendations and/or industry <br />Sitewide SPCC Plan completed May 4, 2016. <br />Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) plan. Liquid level sensing devices must be installed in accordance with CFR 112.8 and shall be <br />standards to ensure they are functioning properly. <br />Plan identifies what overfill prevention <br />regularly tested to ensure proper operation. Immediately conduct all necessary testing of liquid level sensing devices, or provide equivalence as <br />method is used for each container and states <br />allowed by CFR 112.7(a)(2). <br />that sensing devices must be tested as per <br />manufacturer's recommendations and/or <br />industry standards to ensure they are <br />functioning properly. <br />Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act Inspection Report <br />Ir <br />� Jt <br />st <br />f� <br />3. <br />�r <br />s <br />to <br />I <br />(r <br />r <br />