My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SPRECKELS
>
407
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542440
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2018 10:49:28 AM
Creation date
9/12/2018 10:18:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0542440
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0024391
FACILITY_NAME
SPRECKELS CLOSURE INVESTIGATION
STREET_NUMBER
407
STREET_NAME
SPRECKELS
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
022125035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
407 SPRECKELS AVE
P_LOCATION
04
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OPERABLE UNIT 10 <br />Description <br />OU 10 Corresponds to Sub-Recommendation 17.1, which concerns a solvent washdown pad. <br />The Phase I identified potential for soil contamination via leaks/spills/improper disposal of <br />petroleum- or solvent-related compounds. Phase II samples were collected and analyzed for <br />petroleum- and solvent-related compounds. <br />Petroleum/Solvents: Existing Data <br />Six soil samples were collected and analyzed for TPEH, Fuel Fingerprint (EPA 8015M), VOCs by <br />GCMS with TICs (EPA 8240), and BTEX (EPA 8260) (Table 10-P, soil samples 14-1 through 14- <br />6). These analyses yielded 230 results, of which all are ND. Most laboratory reporting limits are <br />not tabulated. BTEX and TPH reporting limits, however, are tabulated. Most of these limits are all <br />below Industrial Thresholds, but TPHueh, TPH-JP4, TPHg, MtBE, Benzene, and Ethylbenzene <br />reporting limits are above Protection of Groundwater SSLs. <br />In addition, OU 10 is located in the same area as OU 2. The two Hydropunch samples collected <br />for OU 2 are therefore relevant to OU 10 (Table 0U2-P, Hydropunch samples 11-2-HP and 11- <br />7-HP). Both Hydropunch samples were analyzed for organic lead, TPHg, and purgeable <br />hydrocarbons. One was also sampled for VOCs and EDB. These analyses yielded 57 results. All <br />were ND. Reporting limits were tabulated for organic lead, TPHg, purgeable hydrocarbons, and <br />BTEX. All are below associated Tier 1 and EPA Tap Water ESLs, except for benzene, for which <br />the reporting limit of 0.5 ug/L exceeds the Tier 1 and EPA Tap Water ESLs of 0.46 ug/L, and <br />organic lead, for which the reporting limit of 0.15 ug/L exceeds the EPA Tap Water ESL of 0.0013 <br />ug/L. <br />Petroleum/Solvents: Recommendations <br />Because OU 2 and OU 10 are located in the same area and were investigated for similar <br />petroleum- and solvent-related compounds, these data can be combined into a single dataset, <br />which yields 342 soil results, of which all are ND except for except for two xylenes concentrations <br />of 0.0056 and 0.0065 mg/kg detected at OU 2. While many reporting limits are not tabulated, <br />these data strongly indicate that there are no petroleum-related issues at OU 10. Potential <br />concentrations would be expected to be normally distributed. Such a distribution resulting in only <br />2 detections out of 342 soil results and 0 detections out of 57 groundwater results would have to <br />fall well below reporting limits. Kleinfelder therefore recommends spot-checking the reporting <br />limits to confirm they are reasonably low and therefore constrain potential concentration <br />distributions as expected. <br />Moreover, OU 2 Hydropunch data provide direct evidence of groundwater conditions. These data <br />are all ND. While VOC reporting limits are not tabulated, BTEX are, and they are generally below <br />associated groundwater ESLs. This indicates that groundwater is effectively protected, no matter <br />the soil data reporting limits. Kleinfelder therefore recommends that evaluation of spot-checked <br />soil reporting limits be conducted with the context that direct groundwater data strongly indicate <br />that groundwater has been protected. <br />20173951.001A/SAC17R68420 Page 19 of 26 November 2, 2017 <br />© 2017 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com <br />KLEINFELDER 2882 Prospect Park Dr., Suite 200, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 p I 916.366-1701 f I 916.366-7013
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.