Laserfiche WebLink
Bill Filios 4- 21 November 2017 <br />screening levels. Due to the large quantity of data, the Discharger proposes to spot <br />check the hard copy lab reports to verify the reporting limits. The Closure Work Plan <br />includes spot checking 10%, 20%, 100% and an unknown percentage of the original <br />data sets for the various operational areas. The Report of Findings needs to include the <br />rational for the percentage of data that was spot checked. <br />5. General Chemical Analysis: The Discharger proposes to collect and analyze six soil <br />and two groundwater samples for general chemical constituents including carbonates, <br />bicarbonates, and nitrates in the operable unit 1 area to evaluate potential impacts from <br />the septic tanks and leach lines. Other potential constituents of concern that need to be <br />evaluated to assess the potential impacts from the septic tanks and leach lines include, <br />but are not limited to: potassium, sodium, ammonium-nitrogen, organic-nitrogen, <br />chloride, sulfate, phosphate. <br />6 Tetraethyl Lead Analysis: In areas where lead is present at concentrations above <br />screening levels, the Discharger shall analyze samples for tetraethyl lead. The Report of <br />Findings needs to include the tetraethyl lead sampling results and an evaluation of <br />tetraethyl lead impacts on the Site. <br />7. Pesticides and Herbicides Analysis: The list of pesticides and herbicides the <br />Discharger proposes to analyze soil and groundwater for was not included in the Closure <br />Work Plan. The Report of Findings shall include a discussion detailing why the specific <br />pesticides and herbicides were selected for analysis. Additionally, the Discharger shall <br />include 1,2,3-trichloroproane (1,2,3-TCP) in the pesticides and herbicides analyses. The <br />1,2,3-TOP analyses shall be completed with low enough reporting limits to compare the <br />concentrations to the California maximum contaminant level for 1,2,3-TOP of <br />5 nanograms per liter. <br />Central Valley Water Board staff conditionally concur with the proposed investigation <br />scope-of-work detailed in the Closure Work Plan as long as the comments listed above are <br />appropriately addressed. As detailed above, this concurrence with the proposed investigation <br />scope-of-work does not constitute Central Valley Water Board concurrence with the data <br />evaluation and conclusions presented in the Closure Work Plan. Please notify staff of the field <br />schedule at least one week in advance of the start of various field activities. A Report of <br />Findings should be submitted to this office by 45 days after the completion of field work no later <br />than 30 March 2018. All future reports submitted to the Central Valley Water Board shall also <br />be uploaded onto GeoTracker. . <br />If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at (916) 464-4682 or <br />Am .Ha • waterboards.ca. ov. <br />Amy Ha, P. <br />Water Resources Control Engineer <br />Private Sites Cleanup Unit <br />cc: Linda Turkatte, San Joaquin County Environmental Health, 1868 E. Hazelton Ave. <br />Stockton, CA 95205 <br />Anthony Wohletz, Kleinflelder, 2882 Prospect Park, Sacramento, CA 95670