COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FORM IC Sec. VI - Generator Status EPA ID N0. C A 0 0 9 1 1 3 9 1 0 A. 1991 RCRA generator status B. Reason for not generating Instruction page 7 Page 9 (CHECK ONE BOX BELOW) (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 91 1 LOG ❑ 1 Never generated ❑ 4 Only non -hazardous waste ❑ 2 SOG (SKIP TO SEC. VII) ❑ 2 Out of business ❑ 5 Periodic or occasional generator ❑ 3 CESOG ❑ 3 Only excluded or delisted ❑ 6 Waste minimization activity ❑ 4 Non generator (CONTINUE TO BOX B) waste ❑ 7 Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELOW) Sec. VII - On -Site Waste Management Status A. RCRA permitted or interim status storage B. RCRA permitted or interim status C. RCRA-exempt treatment, disposal, or recycling Instruction page 10 treatment, disposal, or recycling Page 11 Page 10 U u L1J Sec. VIII - Waste Minimization Activity during 1990 or 1991 A. Did this site begin or expand a source B. Did this site begin or expand a C. Did this site systematically investigate opportunities reduction activity during 1990 or 1991? recycling activity during 1990 or 1991? for source reduction or recyclino during 1990 or 1991? Instruction page 11 Page 12 Page 12 ❑ 1 Yes ❑ 1 Yes ❑ 1 Yes ,�) 2 No U 2 No g] 2 No D. Did any of the factors listed below delay or limit this site's ability to initiate new or additional source reduction activities in 1990 or 1991? Page 12 (CHECK YES OR NO FOR EACH ITEM) Yes_ 1Q ❑i ❑ 2 a. Insufficient capital to install new source reduction equipment or implement new source reduction practices 01 ❑ 2 b. Lack of technical information on source reduction techniques applicable to the'specific production processes 01 ❑ 2 c. Source reduction is not economically feasible: cost savings in waste management or production will not recover the capital investment ❑l ❑ 2 d. Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction 01 Uj 2 e. Technical limitations of the production processes ❑l 12 2 f. Permitting burdens 01 ❑ 2 g. Source reduction previously implemented — additional reduction does not appear to be technically feasible ❑l ❑ 2 h. Source reduction previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be economically feasible ❑l ❑ 2 i. Source reduction previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be feasible due to permitting requirements 01 ® 2 j. Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELOW) E. Did any of the factors listed below delay or limit this site's ability to initiate new or additional on-site or off-site recycling activities during 1990 or 1991? Page 12 (CHECK YES OR NO FOR EACH ITEM) YES- NQ YES UQ ®1 ❑ 2 a. Insufficient capital to install new recycling equipment :c]1 ❑ 2 h. Technical limitations of production processes inhibit or implement new recycling practice on-site recycling Qt ❑ 2 b. Lack of technical information on recycling techniques 1 ❑ 2 i. Permitting burdens inhibit recycling applicable to this site's specific production processes 1 ❑ 2 j. Lack of permitted off-site recycling facilities ®1 ❑ 2 c. Recycling is not economically feasible: cost savings in 81 ❑ 2 k. Unable to identify a market for recyclable materials waste management or production will not recover the Ell `3e 2 I. Recycling previously implemented — additional capital investment 01 ® recycling does not appear to be technically feasible 2 d. Concern that product quality may decline as a result ❑i ® 2 m. Recycling previously implemented — additional Of recycling 01 ® Requirements recycling does not appear to be economically feasible 2 e. to manifest wastes inhibit shipments off ®1 ❑ 2 n. Recycling previously implemented - additional site for recycling ❑1 ® recycling does not appear to be feasible due to 2 f. Financial liability provisions inhibit shipments off site for permitting requirements recycling ❑i IN 2 o. Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELOW) ❑1 IN 2 g. Technical limitations of production processes inhibit shipments off site for recycling our Volume Of zar us waste, comes from activated carbon thatt used in Comments: OUr groundwater cleanup project. We expect this volurne to reduce, as the remediation progresses and other technologies are applied. Page 2 of - C) carbon is regenerated off site