Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 4.0 EM Dl 'r . <br /> ` RS recommends remediation of the TPHg contaminated vadose soil in the former tank <br /> emplacement by in-situ vapor extraction technology. In-situ treatment of the soil offers the <br /> advantage of removal of VOC where contaminated soil is located close to or under a <br /> building at depths not readily excavated,as has occurred in this case. Specifications for the <br /> Soil Vapor Extraction System are presented in Appendix B of this Work Plan. The Health <br /> &Safety Plan to be implemented during the remedial activities is included in Section 10.0 <br /> of the Specifications, <br /> 5.0 GROUN12WMR MON l VIT1E <br /> RS recommends monitoring of the groundwater to determine the extent of contamination <br /> beneath the site. However, due to the drought, the water table has dropped below the <br /> screened sections of the existing monitoring wells (70 feet deep) and groundwater samples <br /> cannot be obtained at this time. As an alternative,sampling of DWR Registered Wells 2, <br /> 5, & 7 (Table 4, WGR's November, 1989 report), located within an approximately one- <br /> quarter mile radius of the site,was considered. After reviewing pertinent information,this <br /> alternative is not recommended due to the technical difficulty of sampling for VOC in deep <br /> wells and information indicating the existence o&underground fuel tanks located on other <br /> properties in the immediate vicinity of the wells and the site. <br /> w If,during the 1991-1992 winter season,the groundwater elevation rises sufficiently to permit <br /> sampling of the onsite monitor wells,quarterly groundwater monitoring would be initiated <br /> - by RS. If groundwater has not risen sufficiently by the end of the 1991-1992 rainy season, <br /> then three additional monitoring wells would be installed so that site groundwater <br /> monitoring can be re-established. <br /> During vapor extraction operation, it is anticipated that some reduction of VOC in the <br /> groundwater beneath the treatment cell may be achieved. By reducing TPHg concentrations <br /> in the contaminated soil to low or non-detectable levels, further contamination of <br /> groundwater beneaih this site would be minimized. <br /> - 1 <br /> 6.0 PRQJECrJCHRDULE <br /> Figure 4 presents the project schedule for this Soil Vapor Extraction project. <br /> REMEDfAT10N <br /> SERVICES. INC. <br />