Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 DATA ANALYSIS <br /> 4.1 Graphical Summary <br /> Monthly summaries of daily air flow rates and other parameters for the quarter are included in <br /> Appendix A In order to graphically illustrate the operation of the system, data for air flow rate <br /> since January 1996 and total cubic feet of extracted vapor since September 1995 are plotted in <br /> Figures 3 and 4 PID readings and all 1996 laboratory results are graphed in Figure S to illustrate the <br /> effect of the system on soil vapor concentrations <br /> More so than in any previous quarter, flow rates on operating days were very constant, generally <br /> ranging from 40 to 45 cfm The only exception was the last few days of the year, when the unit was <br /> -being gradually shut down in anti cpation of the December 31 expiration of the operating permit <br /> After the installation of VE-2,there was a marked increase in vapor concentrations in the deep-well <br /> inlet stream Concentrations rose from 40 ppm to more than 2,000 ppm An increase was to be <br /> expected, since VE-I "deep" was submerged below the static water level most of the year and was <br /> therefore drawing little vapor, but such a large rise was surprising It indicates that the radius of <br /> influence of VE-1 "deep" has been Iess than anticipated, and that an unexpectedly large volume of <br /> gasoline remains within the vadose zone below the clay layer that separates the shallow and deep <br /> wells This will probably be corroborated by soil analytical data from the new extraction well when <br /> the data are released by Emcon <br /> • Laboratory analysis of the vapor samples <br /> P p collected in December indicates that the gasoline <br /> concentration withm the range of influence of VE-I "shallow" has not decreased since the last <br /> sample was collected in August In fact, when converted from parts-per-million by volume to parts- <br /> per-million by weight,the concentration has risen slightly from 137 pprn to 192 ppm (Figure 5) <br /> The sample collected from VE-2 had a TPH-g concentration of 673 ppm by weight This result can <br /> not be compared directly with the concentration of 2,885 ppm that was detected in the sample from <br /> VE-1 "deep" in February, but the result is encouraging It is also considerably below the <br /> concentrations detected by the PID at the inlet port, suggesting that the PID readings are inflated by <br /> the passage of the vapors through the water drop-out drum before being measured at the inlet <br /> 4.2 Weight of VOC's Destroyed <br /> The weight of VOC's extracted during the quarter can be computed from the mean vapor <br /> concentration in the shallow well and the cumulative volume of extracted vapors Visual <br /> examination of Figure 5 suggests that a concentration of 1,500 ppm is a reasonable estimate of the - <br /> mean vapor concentration during the quarter as measured by the PID (the laboratory concentration <br /> may have been somewhat lower) <br /> • 4 <br />