Laserfiche WebLink
#21 CFR 112.7(a)(3)(iii)-SPCC Plan failed to show discharge or drainage controls (secondary <br /> containment), equipment, and procedures for the control of a discharge <br /> Response: Existing tanks are empty and have been properly labeled as empty and dated -,See <br /> #19 <br /> #27 CFR 112.7(b)-SPCC Plan failed to include a description of potential equipment failure <br /> (direction,flow rate, quantity), or provide equivalence as allowed by CFR 112.7(a)(2) <br /> Response: Existing tanks are empty and have been properly labeled as empty and dated-see <br /> #19 <br /> #28 CFR 112.7(c)-Failed to provide secondary containment and/or diversionary structures that are <br /> capable of containing discharge from primary containment until it is cleaned up <br /> Response: Existing tanks are empty and have been properly labeled as empty and dated-See <br /> #19 <br /> #46 CFR 112.8(c)(2)-Failed to provide sufficient secondary containment capacity for a bulk <br /> storage tank that would hold the volume of the largest container plus sufficient freeboard to <br /> contain precipitation and/or diked area is not sufficiently impervious to contain discharged oil <br /> Response: Existing tanks are empty and have been properly labeled as empty and dated-See <br /> #19 <br /> #50 CFR 112.8©(8)-Failed to install and regularly test approved level sensing device, or provide <br /> equivalence as allowed by CFR 112.7(a)(2) <br /> Response: Existing tanks will be gauged monthly and readings recorded into Williams Tank <br /> Lines SPCC Plan. The level gauges will be tested to verify that the level sensing devices are <br /> accurate and functional. Records of comparative level reading will be maintained in Appendix K. <br /> See Appendix K <br /> Ik <br /> 07/08/2011 <br />