My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0003020
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
301
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508132
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0003020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2018 8:53:52 AM
Creation date
10/9/2018 1:17:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0003020
FileName_PostFix
XR0003020
RECORD_ID
PR0508132
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0007953
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON #9-5775
STREET_NUMBER
301
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04514002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
301 KETTLEMAN LN
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r. <br />S ECOR <br />r <br />w 5.0 SITE REMEDIATION <br />Between April 6 and June 29, 2000, interim remediation consisting of weekly pumping of water <br />from well EX -1 was conducted by G -R. During weekly well pumping activities, approximately <br />2,635 gallons of water were removed from the site. Concentrations of MtBE in groundwater <br />samples from well EX -1, collected on April 6 and June 29, 2000, decreased from 720,000 µg11 to <br />325,000 µg/l. <br />On July 3, 2000, operation of interim soil vapor extraction (SVE) and groundwater extraction <br />(GWE) remediation was initiated at the site. The interim SVE system consists of four SVE wells <br />(VE -1 through VE -4) and a 100 cubic foot per minute (cfm) catalytic oxidizer. SVE system <br />historical data is presented in Tables 5 and 6. The interim GWE system initially consisted of <br />one extraction well (EX -1) and three 2,000 pound carbon vessels in series. A submersible <br />pump and the necessary piping (to the existing GWE system) were installed to begin <br />groundwater extraction at MW -14. Well MW -14 was converted to an extraction well, and <br />renamed EW -2, to increase groundwater extraction and establish capture of the plume. <br />Groundwater extraction from EX -2 was initiated on September 22, 2000. A third extraction well <br />(EX -3) was installed, and GWE from EX -3 began on November 28, 2000. GWE historical data <br />is presented in Table 7. <br />On August 20, 2003 the SVE system was discontinued following approval of the RWQCB in <br />their letter dated August 18, 2003 and has remained offline. The primary reason for this is as <br />follows: (1) the hydrocarbon removal rates were very low and reached asymptotic levels, (2) the <br />groundwater analytical data showed a decrease in hydrocarbon concentrations, and (3) the <br />plume appeared to be stabilized. <br />On April 18, 2005 groundwater extraction was discontinued to evaluate rebound of chemical <br />constituents. Rebound of chemical constituents was not observed and the GWE system has <br />remained offline. <br />The primary sources of contamination have been removed and MtBE contamination at the site <br />is mainly isolated in the A -Zone near the former USTs. Therefore, without any additional source <br />the plume is expected to decrease with time by natural attenuation and/or biodegradation prior <br />to reaching any down gradient groundwater wells or City of Lodi Municipal wells. In addition, <br />due to the depth at which the City wells are screened (between 210 and approximately 490 feet <br />bgs), it is unlikely that the City of Lodi wells would be impacted. <br />Typical applications of Best Available Technology (SATs) to similar plumes include oxidation of <br />the plume, enhanced biological treatment, or thermal treatment. Concentrations have been <br />reduced to the point that the incremental cost for further mass removal exceeds the incremental <br />benefit. <br />95775 NFAR REPORT Final.doc 11 SECOR Intemational Incorporated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.