Laserfiche WebLink
MAY S 6 2017 <br />Ei�`Jin0Nr�i11,-.-AL H -EA LT1 <br />SPCC Plan vs. FRP/ERAPChewon <br />■ The Facility Response Plan (FRP) demonstrates a facility's preparedness to respond to a worst case oil <br />discharge (40 CFR 112.20). The FRP includes procedures, emergency response actions (ERAP) and <br />contact information to utilize during a variety of incidents that can occur at the facility. <br />■ The FRP is used to satisfy SPCC requirements on procedures used in the event of a spill. <br />■ The FRP is used to satisfy SPCC requirements for an oil spill contingency plan and a written commitment <br />of resources, when the installation of required secondary containment measures are not practicable. <br />■ The FRP, ERAP and SPCC Plans share much of the same content (e.g. tank table, facility diagrams, <br />worst case discharge scenarios, emergency contact information). <br />Special Considerations: <br />■ Material changes that trigger an update to the SPCC Plan may also trigger an update to the FRP/ERAP. <br />■ Content updated in the electronic copy of the FRP, ERAP or SPCC Plan (stored in the TRP database) <br />may automatically update shared sections within each of these plans. <br />■ Significant updates to the FRP/ERAP, must be resubmitted to the EPA Regional Administrator within 60 <br />days of the change. <br />■ For marine facilities subject to U.S. Coast Guard requirements, there may be additional information that is <br />leveraged between the SPCC Plan and FRP/ERAP (e.g. Facility Security Plan, annual pressure tests. <br />etc.). <br />Contact AP Emergency Response SME (Gerard Taylor) <br />for further guidance on the FRP/ERAP. <br />© 2014 Chevron 18 <br />