Laserfiche WebLink
23 <br /> 1 Q . Okay , If You would!'. why don ' t You Put a <br /> 1 L 2 one, two and a three on each the respective tanks there? <br /> 3 A . Okay . I <br /> I. <br /> 4 Q . Okay . I think you indicated that Tank One <br /> 5 is the one that had 1300 parts per million on the <br /> 6 fourteen feet? ; <br /> 7 A . I will have to go back and look at that . <br /> 8 Could You repeat that? <br /> 3 <br /> 9 Q . Tank One, as you have marked it now was the <br /> 10 one that had the 1300 parts Per million of TPHg? <br /> I� <br /> 11 A . That ' s correct . <br /> .12 Q . On the west side? <br /> 13 A . That ' s correct . <br /> 14 Q . Okay . And Tank Two had 600 parts per <br /> I <br /> 15 million TPHg . Was that on the nest side as well? <br /> _ t <br /> 16 A . That ' s correct, Yes . <br /> 17 Q . And Tank Three had lust some minor 1 <br /> 18 contamination? 'I 1 <br /> I <br /> 19 A . That ' s correct . <br /> 20 Q . This may be more of1a question of curiosity, <br /> 21 but on Mr . Trevena ' s notes he indicates no soil. <br /> I� <br /> 22 discoloration on any of the four samples taken from <br /> 23 Tanks One and Two , which apparently turned out they have <br /> i <br /> 24 significant levels of TPHg . Tank Three he notes soil <br /> i <br /> 25 discoloration at both soil sample locations , although <br /> it r <br /> I� <br /> PORTALE & ASSOCIATESI�( 209 ) 462-3377 <br />