Laserfiche WebLink
{ 13 <br /> TABLE 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> ,t <br /> Site Dame and Location: Joe Wilson Center, 1141 Adams Street,Tracy,Sail Joaquin County <br /> 1.Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, As provided by the County, the nearest municipal well <br /> industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site; is approximately 1,000 feet southeast of the site. <br /> itOne 1,500-gallon fuel oil <br /> ,. 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of former and existing tank;systems, <br /> UST was removed in 11/01. <br /> ❑ <br /> I excavation contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring well elevation contours, Site maps are provided in <br /> gradients, and nearby surface waters, buildings,streets, and subsurface utilities; the UST Removal Report <br /> ❑ 3.Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams; Soil investigation consisted of UST removal andoverexcavation of contaminated soils to 14 feet. <br /> A soil profile was not required. <br /> Approximately eight tons of impacted soil was excavated from the <br /> ❑ 4.Stockpiled soil disposed off-site(quantity); tank pit and disposed at Forward Landfill. <br /> i , <br /> 5.Monitoring wells remaining an-site, fate; Groundwater contamination was not identified,and monitoring wells were not <br /> installed. I4 <br /> Monitoring wells were not installed. First <br /> .r—N 1 6-Tabulated results of all groundwater elevations and depths to water, groundwater was identified at 14 feet in the tank pit <br /> Maximum soil contamination only showed diesel at 10,000 mg/kg, <br /> 7 Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: which was later excavated and disposed off site. Lead was detected in <br /> ©Detection limits for confirmation sampling soil at 14 to 24 mg/kg, whlch is within background concentrations for <br /> Lead analyses this area. Groundwater grab samples from the tank pit were non- <br /> detect for all constituents including M(BE and fuel oxygenates. <br /> ❑ 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil 1 k <br /> Y Diesel impacted soil was excavated and <br /> and groundwater,and both on-site and off-site: °� disposed off-site. Groundwater <br /> Lateral and Vertical extent of sot!contamination contamination was not identified. <br />' Lateral and ❑ Vertical extent of groundwater contamination <br /> Based on the limited contamination,site <br /> 9.Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface !{4 remediation beyond sall <br /> excavation and <br /> i remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and disposal was not required. <br /> groundwater remediation system, <br /> 3 <br /> ❑ 10.Reports/information n Unauthorized Release Form QMRs <br /> Boring logs EI PAR El <br /> FRP UST Rer�r�ioval Report, 1/2002 <br /> 1}❑ The USTs and contaminated soils were 11.Best Available Technology(BAT)used Oran explanation for not using BAT; <br /> removed. <br /> background Soil contamination was excav ted and disposed off-site. Groundwater <br /> ❑ 12 Reasons why warms contamination was not ldent1hed. <br /> unattainable using BAT, <br /> i3.Mass balance calculation of substance Based on the removal of contaminated soils and no detectable groundwater <br /> ❑ contamination,.an estimate of the remaining mass was not required. <br /> treated versus that remaining; <br /> Due to o detectable groundwater contamination,a risk <br /> El14.Assumptions,parameters,calculations and model used in risk assessment was not required. <br /> assessments, and fate and transport modeling; <br /> Y 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely Contaminated soils were disposed off-site,and <br />! groundwater contamination was not identified. <br /> impact water quality,health, or other beneficial uses;and <br /> By: Comments:A 1,500-gallon UST was removed from the site on 29 November 2001. The former UST was used to store fuel <br /> MH oil for heating boilers that were taken out of service poor to November12001. Sail contamination was identified during the <br /> UST removal at 12 feet, and 8.58 fans of impacted soil was removed and disposed at Forward Landfill in December 2001. <br /> The confirmation soil sample following overexcavation activities was non-detect for all constituents. Two groundwater grab <br /> for all <br /> t excava <br /> tect <br /> Date: samples <br /> constituents were <br /> including Mtfrom the tank BE and fuel oxrygenat st <br /> 315102 at appropriate detection limits, The former UST site isein a parking lot area <br /> for the Joe Wilson Center, which has been repaved with asphalt. Based on the site investigation and excavation activities <br /> completed to date, Board staff concur with San Joaquin County's closure recommendation. <br />