SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

Peter Dinh Van Bui -2- Claim No. 19612 If you disagree with this Final Staff Decision, you may appeal to the Fund Manager pursuant to Section 2814 of the Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Regulations. If you would like review of the decision by the Fund Manager, please submit your request along with any additional documentation to: John Russell, P.G., Fund Manager, Claim #019612 Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund State Water Resources Control Board Division of Financial Assistance P.O. Box 944212 Sacramento, CA 94244-2120 A request to the Fund Manager must include, at a minimum: (1) a statement describing how the claimant is damaged by the prior Staff Decision; (2) a description of the remedy or outcome desired; and (3) an explanation of why the claimant believes the Staff Decision is erroneous, inappropriate or improper. If you do not request a review by the Fund Manager within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this letter, the Final Staff Decision will then become final and conclusive. If you do request a review by the Fund Manager, you must also submit the following: It appears the last operating permit was issued for 1994, causing a lapse in permit compliance between 1994 and 1997, when the tanks were removed. If a temporary closure was issued by San Joaquin County, or if an exemption exists, please provide verification. It also appears that a lapse in permit compliance occurred in 1988, as a penalty was assessed according to the "Fee Information" submitted. Note: Claimants are not eligible to participate in the Fund if permit compliance is not maintained. 2. Verification that all UST storage fees (for the tanks that are the subject of this claim) due on or after January 1, 1991, imposed by Section 25299.41 of the Health and Safety Code have been paid. It is noted that a request has been made to BOE and verification will be sent when received from BOE. 3. Please verify there was no removal report written by your consultant. 4. It is unclear if there were employees, and if so, how many. According to the "Request for Assignment of Claim to Priority B..." Form, there were no employees. If that is the case, you must submit a letter stating there were no employees for you and any affiliates, and sign under penalty of perjury. We also received a letter dated 5/4/11 that states there are "fewer than 100 employees". California Environmental Protection Agency P. Recycled Paper