Laserfiche WebLink
KLEINFELDER <br /> In June 1995 PSC proceeded with the installation of air-s ar ing wells SP-2 through <br /> . p P 9 <br /> ' SP-6 However, implementation of the sparge and vent remediation was postponed <br /> due to naturally occurring petroleum-hydrocarbon concentration reductions that were <br /> observed at the time <br /> In May 1999, PSC performed a subsurface investigation using cone-penetrometer- <br /> testing (CPT) technology Soil and groundwater samples were submitted for analysis <br /> from three CPT borings (CPT-1 through CPT-3) The CPT investigation indicated that <br /> the lateral extent of impacted groundwater was largely contained within the Earthgrain's <br /> property boundaries PSC reported the results of this investigation in the May 1999 <br /> Subsurface Investigation and Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> An additional air-sparging and soil-venting pilot test was performed in June 2000 using <br /> VW-1 as the vent well The test was performed in accordance with the May 15, 2000 <br /> Pilot Testing Work Plan The pilot test results indicated that this technology would be <br /> an effective method of treating petroleum-hydrocarbon impact at the site Operation of <br /> a full-scale air-sparging and soil-venting remediation system was initiated on April 25, <br /> 2001 PSC installed a new air-sparging well (SP-A) on March 14, 2002 upon indication <br /> that the air infection at SP-1 was not resulting an adequate decrease of petroleum <br /> ' impact in the groundwater <br /> In December 2002, the remediation system was disengaged, since its effectiveness to <br /> remove contaminants became limited This allowed time to evaluate whether the <br /> petroleum concentrations in groundwater would remain stable The February 2003 <br /> ' groundwater sample from MWA indicated an increase in petroleum concentrations <br /> However, concentrations remained relatively stable in samples collected from other <br /> wells in the area of impact <br /> ' PSC submitted the April 14, 2003 Remedial Action Completion Report to SJCEHD The <br /> report presented a Site Conceptual Model, which characterized the release, subsurface <br /> conditions, and associated risks to potential receptors PSC determined that potential <br /> routes of exposure were improbable or incomplete and requested that SJCEHD <br /> consider granting closure SJCEHD directed additional site investigation be performed <br /> in their January 9, 2004 response letter The February 20, 2004 Subsurface <br /> Investigation Work Plan, which proposed details of site work, was submitted to and <br /> approved by SJCEHD <br /> C23-484517-BOOISAC5R609 Page 3 of 12 September 14, 2005 <br /> Copyright 2005 Kleinfelder Inc <br />