Laserfiche WebLink
File No 2070-2 <br /> 23 March 1994 <br /> Page 2 <br />' Due to the limited quantity of groundwater in monitoring wells MW-6 and MW-8, temperature, <br /> conductivity and pH readings were not obtained for these wells Monitoring well MW-6 was purged <br /> of approximately 2 0 gallons of groundwater while monitoring well MW-8 was purged of <br />' approximately 5 0 gallons of groundwater The purged groundwater was contained in a 55-gallon <br /> drum and stored on the site <br /> Following completion of the well purging, the wells were allowed to recharge Upon adequate <br /> recharge, each well was sampled via a discrete, disposable bailer The groundwater samples were <br /> placed in sterile containers, stored on ice and transported to the analytical laboratories of Curtis & <br />' Tompkins in Berkeley Laboratory analyses were conducted for the following parameters <br /> • total petroleum hydrocarbons (method 8015 modified), <br /> • "BTEX" (EPA method 602), <br /> • total lead (EPA method 7421) <br /> 4 0 Field Data and Site Determinations <br />' The local flow direction and gradient of the groundwater for the fourth quarter 1993 was calculated <br /> based on the static groundwater elevations measured in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3 and MW-6 <br />' The local flow direction of the groundwater for the fourth quarter 1993 was determined to be toward <br /> the northeast with a gradient of 0 0019 rciri (see Figure 2) This is consistent with the east/northeast <br /> flow directions calculated for prior samplings <br /> While obtaining the groundwater samples, particular attention was paid to whether any noticeable <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon odor, discoloration or floating product was evident in the wells The <br /> following was noted during our sampling <br /> The groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-1 had a strong petroleum <br />' hydrocarbon odor and was discolored gray No floating product was noted <br /> • The groundwater in monitoring well MW-2 had a moderate petroleum hydrocarbon odor <br />' No discoloration or floating product was noted There was insufficient water in monitoring <br /> well MW-2 to collect a sample <br />' • The groundwater in monitoring well MW-3 had no noticeable odor, discoloration or <br /> floating product There was insufficient water in monitoring well MW-3 to collect a <br /> sample <br /> • Monitoring well MW-4 was dry at the time of our sampling <br /> • Monitoring well MW-5 was dry at the time of our sampling <br /> • The groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-6 had no noticeable odor, <br /> discoloration or floating product <br /> • Monitoring well MW-7 was dry at the time of our sampling <br /> ANDERSON <br /> CONSULTING <br /> I GROUP <br />