Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 4) The groundwater in monitoring well MW-3, located approximately 200 feet northeast of <br /> the prior tank cluster, had no notILCable odor, dis,oloration or floating product There was <br /> insufficient water in monitoring well MW-3 to collect a sample <br />' 5) Monitoring well MW-4, located approximately 100 feet northwest of the prior tank cluster, <br /> was dry at the time of our sampling <br />' 6) Monitoring well MW-5, located approximately 70 feet southeast of the prior tank cluster, <br /> was dry at the time of our Sampling <br />' 7) The groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-6,located approximately 230 <br /> feet northwest of the prior tank cluster, had no detectable petroleum hydrocarbons This is <br /> consistent with prior samplings <br /> 8) Monitoring well MW-7, located approximatc,ly 100 feet east of the prior tank cluster, was <br /> dry at the time of our Sampling <br /> 9) The groundwater sample uillcc.ted from monitoring well MW-8,located approximately 170 <br /> feet east of the prior tank clu%ter, had no detectable petroleum hydrocarbons This is <br />' consistent with prior samplings <br /> 10) Lead was detected in the groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1, <br />' MW-6 and MW-8 <br /> Ii you have any questions LonLernuig this report or the thitd quarter 1993 sampling, please feel free <br /> to contact us We anticipate our iourth quarter 1993 Sampling to be conducted in December <br /> Respectfully, <br />' ANDERSON CONSULTING GROUP <br />' Daniel D Dottai <br /> Pioject Engine Geologist ogwoFESS/o/q <br /> �///J-116, n / Baker, E , R E °C t2�3271 <br />' Duectzi, Envito zmental Dr tit tt E� !4y <br />' Marl. Mdwird Burlinvon -mit Q'UF <br /> Margaret 1-a-ono San Joaquin C'oi gni <br /> 1 <br /> Attachments <br /> ddd e 1070 2 qs6 <br /> ANDERSON <br /> CONSULTING <br />' GROUP ' <br />