Laserfiche WebLink
File No 2070 2 <br /> 30 November 1993 <br /> Pdge i <br />' 10 Status of Site Activities <br /> A Problem Assessment Report (PAR) for the site was issucd on 19 December 1991 by Anderson <br />' Consulting Group (ACG) The PAR summarized activities conducted at the site since the discovery <br /> in December 1986 of the release of petroleum hydrocarbons from several underground storage tanks <br /> Included in the PAR was a summary of investigations, conducted by Environmental Sciences and <br /> tEngineering (ESE) and ACG, to dctermme the extent of soil and groundwater contamination <br /> Additionally, a summary of soil remediation activities conducted in 1987 by remediation contractors <br /> Telford and Hall was also included <br />' Remediation of petroleum-impacted groundwater at the site has not been conducted,but is proposed <br /> Until a groundwater treatment sytitcm is on-line, the San Joaquin County Health Department has <br />' requested that quarterly groundwater monitoring he conducted in accordance with the State of <br /> California Regional Water Quality Control Board'% Underground Storage Tank Regulations <br />' 2 0 Groundwater Monitorin f <br /> The groundwater elevations for monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-6 and MW-8 were <br /> measured and recorded on 21 October 1993 Monitoring well~ MW-4, MW-5 and MW-7 were dry <br /> at the time of our monitor ing <br /> The elevations weic used to calculate the ideal gloundwatLI flow direction and gradient for the third <br /> quarter 1993 Table 1 pre%cnts the gioundwatc,r cic.vatum mr a%urLments The groundwater flow <br /> direction and gradient is discutiticd iii Section 4 0 <br />' 3 0 Groundwater Samplin�� <br /> Sampling of the groundwater monitoring wclh was wriducted on 21 October 1993 Due to low <br />' groundwater levels, only wells MW-1, MW-6 and MW-8 contained Buff Lient water to allow samples <br /> to be collected <br /> Prior to sampling, the monitoring wells were pulgcd of well casing water For monitoring well MW-1, <br /> the temperature conductivity and pH of the groundwater was measured and recorded in five gallon <br /> intervals during purging This data was u,,cd as an aid in determining when an adequate volume of <br /> water had been removed from the well do that the true formational groundwater could be sampled <br /> A total of 25 gallons of groundwater were purged from monitoring well MW-1 <br /> Due to the limited quantity of groundwater in monitoring wells MW-6 and MW-8, temperature, <br /> conductivity and pH readings were not obtained for these wells Monitoring well MW-6 was purged <br /> of approximately 1 0 gallon of groundwater while monitoring well MW-8 was purged of approximately <br />' 3 5 gallons of groundwater The purged groundwater was containerized in a 55-gallon drum and <br /> stored on the site <br /> ANDERSON <br /> C , CONSULTING <br /> V GROUP <br />