Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />Mr. Werner Sicvol - 3 - L 16 September 1999 <br />likely to be the most cost-effective alternative. The report recommends updating the model prior to <br />final design and implementation. Based on the discussions in this letter, it is clear that Alternative <br />A will not meet the WQOs specified in Table 1. Therefore, BP must implement Alternative B or <br />some other alternative to capture the entire plume and meet the WQOs. <br />By 1 November 1999, please submit a remedial action plan addendum which is designed to capture the <br />entire plume and meet the WQOs. If you have any questions, you may call me at (916) 255-3081 or e- <br />mail at isorenp@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov. <br />�,t4 ; - zr-,A� <br />PHlLWS. ISORENA <br />Associate Engineer <br />140 <br />San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Stockton <br />Mr. Fred Kintzer, Parsons Engineering Science, Inc, Oakland <br />