Laserfiche WebLink
2 0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING, SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> On December 19, 2003, to comply with quarterly groundwater monitoring requirements, Ramage <br /> Environmental monitored and sampled the three wells, for the fifth consecutive quarter <br /> 2.1 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Depth-to-groundwater was measured using a water level indicator capable of measurements to <br />' within 0 01 foot The depth to the groundwater table, as measured in the three monitoring wells, <br /> ranged from 48 09 feet bgs in MW-2 to 48 53 feet bgs in MW-3 The corresponding groundwater <br /> surface elevations in the three wells ranged from a high of 27 00 feet below mean sea level (msl) <br /> at MW-2 to a low of 27 29 feet below msl at MW-3 The resulting groundwater surface appears <br /> as a regular plane dipping toward the north-northeast at a gradient of approximately 0 0015 <br /> foot/foot A groundwater surface contour map is included as Figure 3 The well construction <br /> details, wellhead elevations and groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Table 5 The <br /> sample information field sheets are included as Appendix A <br /> December 19 2003 the groundwater otentcometric surface rose an <br /> Between September 15, and g p <br /> average of 1 74 feet, the groundwater gradient decreased from 0 0020 to 0 0015 foot/foot, and the <br /> groundwater flow direction shifted approximately 40 degrees toward the north-northeast Over the <br /> past five quarters, the groundwater flow direction has been toward the north and northeast The <br /> historical groundwater flow directions are shown on Figure 2 <br /> 22 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis <br /> Following groundwater level measurements, the wells were purged and sampled The wells were <br /> jpurged with a pump and dedicated disposable tubing until at least three well casing volumes had <br /> been removed and/or after groundwater temperature, pH and electrical conductivity values had <br /> stabilized Groundwater was sampled from the wells using disposable polyethylene bailers and <br /> laboratory-supplied containers <br /> Each sample container was transported in an iced cooler with chain-of-custody documentation to <br /> Excelchem Environmental Labs (Excelchem), a state of California certified hazardous waste <br /> testing laboratory (#2119) Excelchem analyzed each sample for TPH-as het fuel, TPH-as- <br /> gasoline and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8020/8015M, and <br /> for methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), di-isopropyl ether(DIPS), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), <br /> tertiary amyl methyl ether(TAME), and tertiary butanol (TBA) by EPA Method 8260B <br /> 6 <br />