My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REMOVAL 1999
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
574
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231405
>
REMOVAL 1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 2:30:16 PM
Creation date
10/29/2018 9:31:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
REMOVAL 1999
FileName_PostFix
1999
RECORD_ID
PR0231405
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003164
FACILITY_NAME
A ONE GAS & FOOD
STREET_NUMBER
574
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
574 W GRANT LINE RD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sent by: STRUCTURES LAB,CSULB 562 985 4406 06/09/99 12:08 Job 176 Page 2/2 <br />of about 3 psi (about 8 hour period) on the annular space only. Determine whether or not <br />water is still evident at the lowest point or at the location of the electronic sensor. If no <br />water is present at the location of the electronic sensor, a standard vacuum test shall be <br />conducted per recommendations of CS to certify the tank. If both the vacuum and the <br />pressure test pass, then I believe the tank should be considered acceptable and certifiable_ <br />If either the vacuum or pressure test fail in the last part of Step 2, then it is evident that <br />the secondary wall is leaking water into the annular space. Based on past experience, it is <br />my opinion that the location of this cracked secondary wall region is difficult to <br />determine, even with the use of helium or other types of tracing; gases, especially when <br />the concrete slab has been poured over the tank. If no other procedure is feasible in <br />determining whether or not the secondary shell is leaking. I would then recommend that <br />the tank be removed from the ground and the standard procedures recommended by CS <br />be employed to determine the location of the leakage followed by repair. utilizing the <br />procedures outlined by CS. <br />To pressurize the annular region alone requires considerable care, to avoid damage to the <br />tanks. It is, therefore, recommended to pressurize the primary tank, bleed into the annular <br />region, then remove the pressure from the primary tank. While removing the pressure <br />from the primary tank, the valve to the annular space should be closed. It is possible that <br />the pressure in the annular space will drop significantly after the primary tank has been <br />depressurized, due to the elastic deformations of the primary shell. Therefore, this <br />process may have to be repeated several times, to attain a reasonable pressure of about 3 <br />psi in the annular region only. The pressure in the primary tank should be the maximum <br />nrescribed by CS for such a testinsr nrocedure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.