My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
520
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0529405
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2018 10:43:30 AM
Creation date
10/31/2018 12:18:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0529405
PE
2220
FACILITY_ID
FA0000380
FACILITY_NAME
KMART #7486
STREET_NUMBER
520
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
520 S CHEROKEE LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CHEROKEE\520\PR0529405\COMPLIANCE INFO PRE 2015.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO PRE 2015
QuestysRecordDate
11/1/2016 3:51:28 PM
QuestysRecordID
3247185
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ti <br /> 1 20, Chapters 6.5 and 6.95,and their implementing regulations,at KMART's operating retail <br /> 2 facilities in California on and before May 1,2009. As set forth in the Complaint filed concurrently <br /> 3 herewith(the"Complaint'), the People allege that KMART violated Chapters 6.5 and 6.95 of <br /> 4 Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code, and the regulations promulgated under those chapters; <br /> 5 and Business and Professions Code section 17200, et seq., by KMART's improper handling, <br /> 6 disposal, treatment, and/or storage of hazardous waste and hazardous materials generated in the <br /> 7 course of their operation of their California retail facilities from May 2003,through and including <br /> 8 May 1, 2009. <br /> 9 The Parties engaged in settlement negotiations prior to the filing of this Final Judgment. In <br /> 10 those settlement negotiations the People were represented by the Attorney.General of the State of <br /> 11 California and the District Attorneys for the Counties of San Joaquin,Ventura, and Riverside. <br /> 12 KMART was represented by Michael Steel of Morrison&Foerster, LLP. <br /> 13 The Parties have agreed to settle this matter without litigation pursuant to the terms of this <br /> 14 Final Judgment. Towards this end, the People have filed their Complaint simultaneously with the <br /> 15 lodging of this Final Judgment and a motion for approval of this Final Judgment. <br /> 16 The People believe that the resolution embodied in this Final Judgment is fair and reasonable <br /> 17 and fulfills the People's enforcement objectives; that the terms of this Final Judgment are <br /> 18 appropriate; and that entry of this Final Judgment is in the best interests of the public. This Final <br /> 19 Judgment is neither an admission nor a denial by KMART regarding any issue of law or fact alleged <br /> 20 in the Complaint in this matter or of any violation of any law. <br /> 21 FINAL JUDGMENT INCLUDING INJUNCTION <br /> 22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION; ORDER <br /> 23 The Parties, after opportunity for review by their respective counsel,hereby stipulate and <br /> 24 consent to the entry of this Final Judgment as set forth below. <br /> 25 1. DEFINITIONS <br /> 26 Except where otherwise expressly defined in this Final Judgment, all terms shall be <br /> 27 interpreted as set forth herein and consistent with Chapters 6.5 and 6.95 of Division 20 of the Health <br /> 28 and Safety Code and the regulations promulgated under those chapters. <br /> 2 <br /> sF-2679421 <br /> STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.