Laserfiche WebLink
A. 1993 RCRA generator state <br />Instruction post 10. <br />(CHECK ONE BOX BELOM <br />it I Lao <br />0 2 SaG SKIP to SEC. VI <br />e <br />s <br />C] <br />S. Rescue for not generating <br />pop 12. <br />(CHECK ALL THATAPPLY) <br />e <br />112 Out of basiona; <br />A111230-7-7 <br />Ll <br />A. St to RCRA ponAting ropirsomwo Page 1B. That t. ar to RCRA erg <br />L —L I requirements pop 13. U <br />Ise -VII • Wine 1111ohninden Artift during 1 M or 19 <br />C. RCRA-exempt troationt. dkpna ar racycks Page <br />19. <br />I 1 <br />A. Did this she bepi or expand a source reduction activity B. Did this As begin or expand a gqft activity florin g 1992 or C. Did this ate knotigets <br />during 1992 or 18837 Pose 14. INV Palo 16. for toorcii reduction or MEEM during 1982 or 1893': <br />Pogo 15. <br />0 1 yes 0 1 yes 0 1 Yes <br />IIE2 No t2 No 1(2 No <br />0. Did toy of the factors fated bolow derby or ' ' this °s SMY to skate now a reduction activities in 1882 or IBM Pogo 15 <br />(CHECK TES OR NO FOR EACH ITEM) <br />yes <br />No <br />a. Insufficient capital to ictal now recycing squipmest or <br />yesNo <br />01 <br />01 <br />)72 <br />s. <br />IRUMCkOt capital to Istel now scums reduction or imphnnourt now source reduction practices <br />01 <br />V2 <br />b. <br />Lank of technical information on source reduction techniques appluble to the specific production <br />01 <br />X2 <br />c <br />reduction is act Ommiclk fes savings in wants mossement or production wl not recover the noel invwmwt <br />al <br />92 <br />d. <br />Caesars that product quaity may docins as o mok of am= rwastion <br />R 1 <br />02 <br />e. <br />Technical imitations of the production processes <br />al <br />V, <br />I. <br />Permitting burden <br />0 1 <br />)q2 k. <br />g. <br />Source nductan Previoustv impleansted . additional reduction doss not appear to betodmicsfy feasible <br />0 1 <br />al <br />2 <br />k2 <br />h. <br />Source reduction previously implemented • additional reduction does not appear to be sconamicaly feasible <br />)(2 <br />'2(2 <br />L <br />So an p ted . odditionsl reduction does act appear to be fees" due to permitting requirsawats <br />01 <br />-�2 <br />e. R@qVhMMtg to manifest wastes inhibit Shipments of <br />Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELOVA <br />E. Did any of the factors fated blew delay or ' ' the We ab&V to initiate now Of additional once or off -sits MMMki oetivitas during 1992 or IBM Pogo 16. <br />(CHECK YES OR NO FOR EACH ITEM) <br />Yes <br />01 <br />�wNe <br />I°`F <br />a. Insufficient capital to ictal now recycing squipmest or <br />yesNo <br />01 <br />T2 p. <br />Wpkmnt now rooydag practice <br />1 <br />02 <br />b. Lads of technical information on g t <br />)"1 <br />02 h. <br />opplookis to this ofte's specific production process <br />01 <br />X2 L <br />01 <br />X2 <br />C. Racyclog is not econemicok feasible: cost savings <br />0 1 <br />)Z2 ! <br />in wants t wl not remover the capital <br />01 <br />)q2 k. <br />invaurAm <br />01 <br />A2 L <br />01 <br />)(2 <br />d. Concern that product quality may docloo as a resoft of <br />01 <br />-�2 <br />e. R@qVhMMtg to manifest wastes inhibit Shipments of <br />01 <br />an <br />off he for nrydag <br />01 <br />� <br />"1' n, <br />01 <br />A2 <br />I. Financial iSbirdy provisions inhibit shipments off -As for <br />meyeke <br />❑1 <br />0. <br />Tochnicei limitations of production pre n off• <br />she for recycke <br />Technical imitations of production processes inhibit as use <br />Permitting burden inhibit recycling <br />Lack of permitted off-site recydag faa'PRM <br />Unable to identify a market for recyaled moteriek <br />Rocyclof p ted • adifitiouni recycling does not <br />appor to be todmicalyN <br />R prWoanly implemented . additiend recy doss not <br />appear to be economically fin <br />ReCyc1ing P imP ted • additiond myclag dean not <br />appear to be feasible due to permitting requirements <br />Other !SPECIFY COMMENTS 8d BOX BELDIM <br />Paae 2 of 6 <br />