My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALPINE
>
1235
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543389
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2018 8:34:38 PM
Creation date
11/1/2018 10:32:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0543389
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004512
FACILITY_NAME
MAJOR STATIONS
STREET_NUMBER
1235
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ALPINE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
11533055
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1235 E ALPINE AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 2 8 1991 <br /> AMERICAN ENt�iFpf���Ei*�TAi. Hi�.J,�T�� <br /> REAL ESTATE <br /> GROUP <br /> 400 E. Main Street, 3rd Floor <br /> P.O. Box 300-A <br /> Stockton, California 952900055 <br /> October 16, 1991 <br /> Linda A. Terkatte ✓ <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 445 San Joaquin St. <br /> P.O. Box 2009 <br /> Stockton, CA 95201 <br /> Re: Major Mart <br /> 1235 E. Alpine, Stockton, CA <br /> Dear Linda, <br /> Thank you for calling me this morning to advise me of your recent <br /> phone call from Mr. Jay Kamine of Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc. <br /> I am sorry that you have not yet received your copy of the Remedial <br /> Investigation Report of October 9, 1991 -- my copy arrived last <br /> Friday by express courier. <br /> I also appreciate your advice that backfilling of the open <br /> excavation with fill material currently stockpiled onsite, as well <br /> as any needing to be imported, is acceptable at this time. I <br /> understand clearly that you feel this is an appropriate action <br /> based upon our intent to stay with the closure action process. <br /> In particular, I understand your statement that the August 16, 1991 <br /> sampling and testing of the soils stockpiled onsite is considered <br /> indicator testing only, and that confirmation drilling of the <br /> backfilled onsite material will be required if an in situ <br /> remediation program becomes necessary. <br /> We also discussed the latest position of your agency regarding <br /> general policy on groundwater cleanup levels. My recollection is <br /> that you stated that BTEX is usually cleaned to "non-detect" for <br /> each constituent, and I stated that the most stringent levels I <br /> have seen actually applied to a cleanup program are the easy to <br /> remember 115-40-30-20" levels, which happened to exist in the State <br /> of Oregon. <br /> Our brief discussion on how to proceed from this point forward <br /> indicates to me that you are expecting the consultant to move <br /> forward with preparing a work plan with about three options, one of <br /> which might be no action, and others which might involve soil <br /> venting. I understand your interest in having the work plan reflect <br /> cost effectiveness of the various options. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.