Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> As shown on Table 1, the only hydrocarbon compounds quantified during this quarter were <br /> benzene in MW-2 at 230 jcg/L and in MW-5 at 6 5 µglL and TPH-G in MW-3 at 0 62 mg/L <br />' For the decontamination check sample, all BTEX compounds were found as non-detectable <br /> indicating that field procedures utilized were effective at eliminating potential cross contamina- <br /> tion of the wells For the field duplicate, similar concentrations were found in both samples <br />' except for benzene which was found at 420 µglL in the duplicate versus 230 µg/L in the primary <br /> sample A review of internal lab procedures failed to find an error in calculations, therefore the <br /> duplicate analysis must be given equal weight in evaluating groundwater quality as the primary <br />' sample <br /> As shown on Table 2, groundwater quality trends at the site indicate that the only compound <br />' currently found in significant concentration in groundwater at the site is benzene However, the <br /> compound was found only in wells MW-2 and the newly installed MW-5 at the southeast corner <br /> of the site The chart also shows that lead a _pears to have been detected in the groundwater for <br />' the first time This is unlikely and the re orted-soncentrations are likely due to variability of <br /> thea ual-lead concentration near the detection limit of the analytical instrumentation n any <br /> case, the concentrations are not sufficient to be viewed as an environmental problem associated <br />' with the site In regard to fecal coliform, no detectable concentrations were found in any of the <br /> monitor wells <br />' During the monitor well sampling, the depth to groundwater was measured in all wells and the <br /> data converted to Mean Sea Level (MSL) elevations for the purpose of plotting groundwater <br /> gradient and direction at the site Figure 3 presents a graphical interpretation of the data which <br /> shows the groundwater direction is generally east at the north end of the site and varying toward <br /> the southeast beneath the southern portion of the site While this information appears to be <br />' different than the flow direction reported in previous quarters (northeast), the difference is likely <br /> due only to the effect of more information available from over a wider area than previously <br /> available due to the installation of the three new monitor wells Therefore, it is unlikely there <br />' has been any significant shift in the flow direction during this quarter <br /> 3.0 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION STATUS <br /> This section presents information related to activities completed (investigatory or remedial) at <br /> the site during the time period July 1992 through October 1992 A revision of the previously <br />' developed remedial plan is also presented which is based on recently developed site data <br /> 3.1 Third Quarter 1992 Activities <br />' As discussed in the introduction to this report, the remedial plan previously developed for the <br /> site included expansion of the original groundwater monitor well field of three wells, removal <br />' of remaining underground piping and installation of a soil vapor extraction (SVE) system to treat <br /> the stockpiled soils onsite as well as any remaining in-place soils in the tank excavation area <br /> Work related to this plan commenced in early September as discussed below <br /> 1 <br /> � MC\RPTs1AREG3QT1t WP 6 W13/92 <br />' I <br />