Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 GROUNDWATER CHARACTERIZATION INFORMATION <br /> 4.1 SUMMARY OF FINAL QUARTERLY MONITORING EVENT <br /> In response to concerns expressed by PHS/EHD, CRC directed SECOR to perform a twelfth and <br /> final quarterly groundwater monitoring event The sampling work was performed on October 24, <br /> 1994 and observed by PHS/EHD staff In an attempt to lower the water level in the onsite <br /> monitoring wells below the screened intervals during purging, an alternative technique was <br /> employed This technique involved the following activity performed by Lawrence Tank Testing, <br />' of Downieville, California <br /> • After SEVOR staff checked for floating product and depth to water, Lawrence <br /> personnel assembled, without solvent glues, a Iength of clean, Schedule 125 PVC <br /> plastic pipe for use downhole as "vacuum-lift" casing <br /> • The vacuum ng blower is started and lifts water at an average rate of approximately <br /> 1 to 2 gallons per minute <br /> • When the graduated purge receiving tank has collected 10 gallons, a grab sample is <br /> collected, the piping is removed, and the water level is measured with a sounder <br /> ® While the purge water parameters are being determined, the system is restarted and <br /> repeated until 30 gallons (approximately six or more casing volumes) are recovered <br /> Measurements performed in MW-2 immediately after purging indicated that the water level had <br />' been lowered at least 0 1 ft below the top of the well screen All other wells monitored immediately <br /> after purging indicated that water levels were lowered only a few hundredths of a foot below the <br /> static water level as a result of this alternative technique Groundwater level measurements for this <br /> event are summarized in Table 5 <br /> The alternative purging technique was useful for the purpose of removing substantially more <br /> wellbore water prior to sampling than previous monitoring events The collected samples were <br /> promptly transported under chain of custody to QUANTERRA, a certified analytical laboratory <br />' No BTEX compounds were detected in any of the six monitoring wells or the MW-2 duplicate <br /> sample, MW-7 The VOC 1,2 DCA was detected in MW-2 and MW-5 PCE was detected only in <br /> I MW-4, -5 and -6 The laboratory analytical results including chain of custody documentation for <br /> this event are provided in Appendix E and the results are also summarized on Table 6 <br /> ISECOR International Inc (SECORO) CRC Env¢onmental Risk Management,Inc <br /> N0026-OOI 01 add 13 November 30 1994 <br /> I <br />