Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br />• (5) A specification of, and a rationale for, the technically feasible and economically practicable source reduction measures that <br />will be taken by the generator with respect to each hazardous waste stream identified in paragraph (3). The review and plan shall <br />fully document any statement explaining the generator's rationale for rejecting any available source reduction approach identified <br />in paragraph (4). <br />(6) An evaluation, and, to the extent practicable, a quantification, of the effects of the chosen source reduction method on <br />emissions and discharges to air, water, or land. <br />(7) A timetable for making reasonable and measurable progress towards implementation of the selected source reduction <br />measures specified in paragraph (5). <br />(S) Certification pursuant to subdivision (d) <br />(9) A generator subject to this article shall include in its source reduction evaluation review and plan four-year numerical goals <br />for reducing the generation of hazardous waste streams through the approaches provided for in subparagraph (B) of paragraph <br />(4), based upon its best estimate of what is achievable in that four-year period. <br />(10) A summary progress report that briefly summarizes and, to the extent practicable, quantifies, in a manner that is <br />understandable to the general public, the results of implementing the source reduction methods identified in the generator's <br />review and plan for each waste stream addressed by the previous plan over the previous four years. The report shall also include <br />an estimate of the amount of reduction that the generator anticipates will be achieved by the implementation of source reduction <br />methods during the period between the preparation of the review and plan and the preparation of the generator's next review and <br />plan. <br />(c) If a generator owns or operates multiple sites with similar processes, operations, and waste streams, the generator may prepare <br />a single multisite review and plan addressing all of these sites. <br />(d) Every review and plan conducted pursuant to this section shall be submitted by the generator for review and certification by <br />an engineer who is registered as a professional engineer pursuant to Section 6762 of the Business and Professions Code and who <br />has demonstrated expertise in hazardous waste management, by an individual who is responsible for the processes and operations <br />• of the site, or by an environmental assessor who has demonstrated expertise in hazardous waste management. The engineer, <br />individual, or environmental assessor shall certify the review and plan only if the review and plan meet all of the following <br />requirements: <br />(1) The review and plan addresses each hazardous waste stream identified pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b). <br />(2) The review and plan addresses the source reduction approaches specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4) of subdivision <br />(b). <br />(3) The review and plan clearly sets forth the measures to be taken with respect to each hazardous waste stream for which source <br />reduction has been found to be technically feasible and economically practicable, with timetables for making reasonable and <br />measurable progress, and properly documents the rationale for rejecting available source reduction measures. <br />(4) The review and plan does not merely shift hazardous waste from one environmental medium to another environmental <br />medium by increasing emissions or discharges to air, water, or land. <br />(e) At the time a review and plan is submitted to the department or the unified program agency, the generator shall certify that the <br />generator has implemented, is implementing, or will be implementing, the source reduction measures identified in the review and <br />plan in accordance with the implementation schedule contained in the review and plan. A generator may determine not to <br />implement a measure selected in paragraph (5) of subdivision (b) only if the generator determines, upon conducting further <br />analysis or due to unexpected circumstances, that the selected measure is not technically feasible or economically practicable, or <br />if attempts to implement that measure reveal that the measure would result in, or has resulted in, any of the following: <br />(1) An increase in the generation of hazardous waste. <br />(2) An increase in the release of hazardous chemicals to other environmental media. A l ® _ V E D <br />(3) Adverse impacts on product quality. p A <br />(4) A significant increase in the risk of an adverse impact to human health or the environment. AUG 0 5 2014 <br />• ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br />DEPARTMENT <br />