My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALPINE
>
1624
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009012
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2018 8:35:06 PM
Creation date
11/1/2018 12:00:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0009012
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004532
FACILITY_NAME
FRMR KEARNEY-KPF FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
1624
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ALPINE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
11708006-09
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1624 E ALPINE AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT capy <br /> -3- <br /> assurance/quality control if the soils are used to construct a liner or cap. <br /> The density of tests per area and per lift must be specified. In addition, some <br /> of these tests have been previously performed using on-site soils and can be <br /> found in the "Report of Supplemental Monitoring Well Installation and Laboratory <br /> Testing" by SNR. <br /> Page 40: The risk assessment is based only on exposure to trace metals which <br /> occur in surface soils or in near surface soils and does not include an exposure <br /> scenario for drinking water where the source is the ground water contaminated <br /> by volatile organic constituents (VOCs) . <br /> Page 45: Four closure alternatives have been proposed which are soil excavation <br /> and off-site disposal , a clay cap, a RCRA cell , and site grading. The facility <br /> should also consider alternative technologies such as solidification or fixation. <br /> Page 45: None of the four closure alternatives included plans for abandonment <br /> of the dry well near Pond 1. <br /> Page 45-46: The closure alternatives requiring excavation did not include plans <br /> for verification sampling for concentrations of waste constituents to be left <br /> in-place. <br /> Page 46: Post closure monitoring is to include quarterly sampling and analyses <br /> for VOCs and selected trace metals from ten shallow monitoring wells. Because <br /> the results from the ground water assessment plan have not ben completed, it is <br /> unknown which wells have been selected and if this is an adequate number. <br /> Additionally, intermediate and deep monitor wells may need to be included in post <br /> closure monitoring. Quarterly ground water monitoring may not be necessary for <br /> the duration of the post closure period. Monitoring could be reduced to <br /> biannually (representative of the dry and wet seasons) after a specified period <br /> of time. <br /> Page 47: Closure Alternative 4 includes leaving hazardous wastes in place and <br /> grading the area for drainage. This alternative would not be acreptable, as it <br /> would be in violation of Section 25208.4(a) of the Toxic Pits Cleanup Act which <br /> prohibits the discharge of liquid hazardous wastes or hazardous wastes containing <br /> free liquids into a surface impoundment after 30 June 1988. <br /> Page 48: Post-closure activities should include ground water monitoring <br /> regardless of the chosen closure alternative because of ground water <br /> contamination from VOCs. Ground water treatment may be required at the site, <br /> therefore, ground water monitoring would continue after closure activities. <br /> Page 49: The Hargis Ground Water Assessment Plan states that wells will be <br /> sampled and analyzed annually for routine constituents (page 61) . Plans for <br /> post-closure monitoring do not include sampling and analyses for routine <br /> constituents. This discrepancy should be clarified. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.