Laserfiche WebLink
Kearny-KPF -2- 1 June 1989 <br /> uniform in nature throughout the soil column for most of the length of the ditch. <br /> At the southern most end of the ditch for approximately 30 feet, a brownish- <br /> yellow silty clay was observed. This soil was approximately 18 inches thick. <br /> A thin layer (1/8 inch) of caliche rested directly above this layer. Caliche <br /> was also observed throughout this soil . This substratum was not observed in <br /> other portions of the ditch due to the side wall erosion and the accumulation <br /> of debris. <br /> I observed the soils in the three proposed disposal areas in the west field. <br /> The field had been disced and therefore the upper three inches of soil were <br /> loose. I also observed the soils in the general area of Pond 1. The soils were <br /> a medium to dark brown clayey silt to silty clay. The soils observed in these <br /> areas did not appear to vary in nature and were very similar to those observed <br /> in profile in the ditch. <br /> INSPECTION SUMMARY: <br /> The soil at the Kearney-KPF site is classified as landlow adobe clay (U.S. <br /> Department of Agriculture, Series 1939, No. 10, May 1951) . The drillers log of <br /> B-4, located in the center of the west field describes the soils/sediments as <br /> predominantly alternating from a clayey silt to a silty clay to a depth of 59 <br /> feet. The Cation-Exchange Capacity milliequivalents per 100 grams (meg/100g) <br /> for soils at the Kearney-KPF site ranged from 22 to 42 meg/100g which represent <br /> average acid-neutralizing potential of the soil . (Canonie Environmental , <br /> Hydrogeologic Assessment Report, June 1986). The depth to ground water at the <br /> site is presently about 60 feet but was at 35 feet three years ago. Other than <br /> the ditch there are no surface water drainages near the field in the western <br /> portion of the facility that could be readily affected by disposal of the muds, <br /> cuttings or development waters. Based on this information, field observations <br /> and on the volume of wastes to be disposed and low concentrations of metals and <br /> volatile organic constituents reported in the muds, cuttings and development <br /> water, the proper disposal of these wastes in the field in the western portion <br /> of the facility should not pose a threat to water quality. Proper disposal <br /> includes incremental applications, using a spreader bar for the development and <br /> aquifer test waters, discing the wastes and soils until thoroughly blended, <br /> allowing the blended material to thoroughly dry prior to adding additional <br /> wastes, not allowing mixing of the three disposal areas and not performing the <br /> disposal during a rain event. <br /> CKW:ej <br /> Attachment <br />