Laserfiche WebLink
Inspection Report : 0 9 Facility Name <br /> Pilkington North America, inc. <br /> Ill. BACKGROUND <br /> On December 14, 2010, DTSC staff conducted a Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEi) of <br /> Pilkington North America, Inc. (PNA) located at 500 East Louise Avenue Lathrop, CA 95330, <br /> San Joaquin County. PNA formerly known as Libbey Owens Ford (LOF) Company. PNA <br /> acquired LOF in 1986. PNA manufactures float glass for the construction and automotive <br /> industries. The manufacturing site at 500 E Louise Avenue Lathrop, San Joaquin County, is <br /> housed in a 165 acres lot with about 160 employees. The facility generally operates 24 hours <br /> per day in three shifts. Raw materials required to manufacture float glass include sand, sodium <br /> carbonate, calcium carbonate, and dolomite. The manufacturing process consists of batch <br /> mixing, melting, annealing, cutting, and packaging. The facility generates various hazardous <br /> wastes including corrosive waste, solid waste, used oils, and flammable liquids. The facility <br /> was inspected previously by DTSC in November, 2003 and was cited for failure to perform <br /> tank assessment for the oil-water tank system, onsite storage of hazardous waste for more <br /> than 90 days, failure to maintain the facility in the acid battery recharging station, failure to <br /> label, and close open containers. A review of the CUPA's inspection reports for their 2007, <br /> 2009, and 2010 inspections indicate that PNA has repeated same violations such as onsite <br /> storage for more than 90 days, failure to complete training records for the employees handling <br /> hazardous waste, failure to update contingency plan, and failure to completely label containers <br /> of hazardous waste. The facility has a history of on going repeated violations from CUPA and <br /> is therefore, a recalcitrant violator (See inspection reports, Attachment B). <br /> The DTSC inspection on December 14, 2010 found that the facility is in violation with <br /> hazardous waste regulations including storage of hazardous waste on-site for greater than 90- <br /> days without authorization, on-site storage of a-waste and empty container for greater than <br /> one year without authorization, failure to properly maintain their facility to prevent releases, <br /> failure to properly label containers of hazardous waste with the hazardous waste markings, <br /> failure to keep containers of hazardous waste closed except when adding or removing <br /> hazardous waste, and disposal of hazardous waste to the trash. After the inspection, a <br /> Summary of Violations (Attachment A) was left with the facility detailing the above violations <br /> and the corrective action necessary to come into compliance. <br /> IV. DOCUMENTS REVIEWED <br /> 1. Employee Training Plan and Records: <br /> Cal. Code Regs., tit. 22, § 66265.16 requires that employees successfully complete classroom <br /> instruction or on-the-job training in hazardous waste management procedures relevant to the <br /> positions they fill, which should also include contingency plan implementation. Facility <br /> personnel shall also take part in an annual review of the initial training (Cal. Code Regs., tit. <br /> 22, § 66265.16, subdivision (c)). In addition, the owner or operator of the facility shall maintain <br /> a training file for the duration of an employ's employment and for three years following their <br /> departure from the facility. The file should contain a record of the employee's name and job <br /> title related to hazardous waste management, a written job description for each position and a <br /> written description of introductory and continuing education given to each ;person filling such <br /> position(s) Cal. Code Regs., tit. 22, § 66265.16, subdivision (d)). <br /> PNA has a written training program that specifies the training requirements for each job <br /> position by job title. DTSC staff reviewed PNA's training documents and found major <br /> deficiencies in the facility's training program. The training deficiencies included a failure to <br /> 3 of 73 <br />