Laserfiche WebLink
compound may be different in a liquid-phase standard than in a vapor. validation is outside the 20%acceptance limit. This validation procedure is <br /> phase standard,especially when it is subjected to being forced into an strongly recommended regardless of the sample introduction technique being <br /> aqueous phase(in the sparger)and forced out into a gaseous phase used. This validation is not only technically sound,it will enhance the <br /> again(during the purge). Therefore,the calibration curve should be defensibility of the data. <br /> matrix-matched. Analytical laboratories should use vapor-phase <br /> standards to calibrate their instruments when employing EPA Method For laboratories that calibrate their analytical system with liquid standards <br /> 8260B/C for soil gas analysis. Gas-phase(or vapor-phase)standards expanded in vials or glass bulbs(headspace technique),validation of the <br /> used for ambient air testing are readily available and can be used for soil calibration curve should be conducted by injecting an aliquot of a vapor-phase <br /> gas analyses. standard(NIST traceable or equivalent)at a volume equal in concentration <br /> (this needs to be calculated based on the volume of the vaporized standard <br /> b. A modification using a liquid-phase standard for calibration that attempts injected and the concentration of the standard,etc.)to the mid-point of the • <br /> to matrix-match the standard to soil gas samples is also being used. The calibration curve to validate and to verify the accuracy of their standard <br /> technique entails injecting the liquid standard into an empty VOA vial preparation technique. The frequency of the validation,percent differences of <br /> through the septum or into glass bulbs and allowing the standard to validation check and reportable data should be the same as for liquid <br /> vaporize and equilibrate before taking an aliquot of the vapor and injecting standards. <br /> it into the gas chromatograph. This is essentially a headspace technique. <br /> This modification attempts to matrix-match the calibration standards to the If vapor-phase standards are used to prepare the calibration curve with EPA <br /> soil gas samples,but this technique may not be amenable to all VOCs Method 8260B,the validation mentioned.above is not necessary. However, <br /> since it is dependent on the vapor pressures of the target analytes and analytical laboratories should verify the accuracy of their vapor-phase <br /> how well they will vaporize in the vial or bulli. The few laboratories that standards periodically by comparing them to a secondary standard either <br /> use this technique are analyzing a limited number of analytes. from another source or to a different lot of standards from the same supplier. <br /> Laboratories using this approach should standardize their procedures(i.e., <br /> temperature range,time for equilibration,etc.)in preparing the calibration 4. Sample Size <br /> standards. Furthermore,laboratories using this technique should validate <br /> and verify the accuracy of their vaporized standards by comparing their The amount of sample to be analyzed is determined by the sample <br /> calibration with vapor-phase standards(see next section). introduction technique in conjunction with the data quality objective of the <br /> project. If lower reporting.limits are desired,then a larger volume of sample <br /> 3. Calibration Validation - needs to be injected. If the direct injection technique is employed,this would <br /> be limited since only a very small volume can be injected onto the GC. With <br /> If liquid-phase standards are used for calibration with EPA Method 8260B/C the sparger technique,a larger volume can be accommodated. Five(5)to <br /> for soil gas samples,then the analytical laboratory should validate their 250 milliliters(mL)of soil gas sample are the typical volumes used,and some <br /> calibration curve for soil gas analysis. Validation is done by analyzing a mid- laboratories have used up to 500 mL of sample.When a larger volume of <br /> level NIST(National Institute of Standard and Technology)traceable(where sampleis used,the sample is introduced into the sparger in aliquots. <br /> available or equivalent)vapor-phase standard(vapor-phase validation check - • <br /> standard)on a routine basis. At a minimum,the vapor-phase validation When an aliquot of soil gas sample is injected into a sparger filled with water, <br /> check standard should be analyzed and evaluated every time a calibration - the gas sample actually spends a very short time in the water. During the <br /> curve is generated. Routinely,a vapor-phase check standard should be "injection of the sample,the gas is forced through the water directly into the <br /> analyzed with each analytical batch to verify the validity of the liquid trap. The contact time with the water is minimal. However,the more water <br /> calibration curve. In addition,the vapor-phase validation check standard soluble compounds(e.g.,ketones,MTBE)will preferentially stay in the water <br /> should include all the target analytes in the calibration curve. The percent phase until purged out. <br /> difference of the validation check standard should be 20%or less in order to <br /> assume that the liquid-phase standard calibration curve is valid for soil gas As part of the validation process,laboratories should validate their injection <br /> samples. Soil gas sample results can still be reported for those compounds technique by injecting aliquots of vapor-phase standards into the sparger and <br /> where the percent difference of the validation standard check is greater than evaluate the recovery levels. Recommended recovery range is 70-130%for <br /> 20%provided that the results are clearly Flagged to indicate that the results most compounds. <br /> are biased because the calibration standards were not matrix-matched and <br /> 12/10/2009 -73- 12/10/2009 -74- <br />