My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AMERICAN
>
820
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536718
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2018 7:14:07 PM
Creation date
11/1/2018 2:52:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0536718
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0021094
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER SIEBOLD CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
820
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AMERICAN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14729211
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
820 S AMERICAN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sample is not necessary since the"clean"matrix is humidified laboratory grade ultra with each batch of samples)by spiking a blank sample at the RL level. There is no <br /> pure air. When prepared as such,this is equivalent to the daily calibration limit on the number of samples per batch for RL verification. Once per day is <br /> (continuing calibration)sample. Therefore,it would be redundant to analyze this sufficient. <br /> QA/QC sample. This QA/QC sample is optional depending on the requirement of the <br /> project CAPP and the project manager. Methods TO-13,TO-15 and TO-17 do not Acceptance Limits:Laboratories should establish their own acceptance levels(limits) <br /> have any requirements for LCS sample analysis. for their QA/QC parameters(i.e.,percent recoveries for surrogates,matrix spikes, <br /> laboratory control samples and percent relative difference for duplicates,etc.)based <br /> • Surrogates:The use of surrogates in soil gas analysis is discretionary. EPA Method on laboratory performance. The limits should be evaluated and updated periodically. <br /> 82608/C requires surrogates whereas Method TO-15 does not. The introduction of For guidance on establishing acceptance limits,consult EPA Method 80008 <br /> surrogates into soil gas samples can present some logistical challenge. Surrogates (December 1996),Section 8.0(SW-846,1996). <br /> • are designed to monitor recoveries of target analytes. Therefore,they should be <br /> introduced at the point of sample collection in order to fully assess the recovery • Standard Operating Procedures:Laboratories should have detailed written Standard <br /> process. Depending on the type of containers being used to collect soil gas samples, Operating Procedures(SOP)for their soil gas sampling and testing procedures. <br /> the introduction of surrogates can be problematic. Copies of the SOP should be available in the laboratory for review and reference. <br /> The SOP should be reviewed on annual basis and updated as needed. Field <br /> For most laboratories that use modified EPA Method 8260B/C,the surrogates are procedures,including sampling procedures,can be written as a'separate SOP from <br /> usually added to the water in the sparger either before or after the soil gas sample the laboratory analytical procedures. <br /> has been forced into the water. Vapor-phase surrogates(which are available for air <br /> analysis)can be theoretically added into soil gas sample aliquot in a gas-tight syringe <br /> just before injecting into the sparger. However,few if any laboratories are using this F-6 DETECTION LIMITS ve REPORTING LIMITS <br /> practice for various reasons. For laboratories using EPA Method TO-15,the <br /> surrogates are added to the sample loop at the same time the soil gas sample is For the purpose of this Advisory,Detection Limit(DL)is defined as the"the minimum <br /> being loaded onto the concentrator. In both instances,the surrogates are added concentration of a substance that can be measured and reported with 99%confidence <br /> after the sample has already been collected. There is a gap between when the that the analyte concentration is greater than zero and is determined from analysis of <br /> sample is collected and when the sample:is analyzed where there are no surrogates sample in a given matrix type containing the analyte"(SW-846,Chapter One,Quality <br /> to monitor the process. Control,Revision 1,July 1992). Reporting Limit(RL)is defined as the lowest <br /> concentration of an analyteahat can be detected in a sample by the given analytical <br /> Some laboratories add"vapor surrogates"immediately after sampling to samples procedure taking into account sample matrix,interferences,dilution factor and the <br /> collected in glass bulbs.The"vapor surrogates"are liquid surrogates that have been lowest point of the calibration curve. Laboratories should use RL in their analytical <br /> injected into a glass bulb,allowed to expand,and aliquots of the"vapor surrogates' reports since it is a more reliable indicator of the limit of detection. <br /> are injected into the glass bulb with the soil gas sample. Cautions should be . <br /> exercised when preparing"vapor"internal standards or surrogates with liquid <br /> standards in either Tedlar bags or glass bulbs. Make sure the internal standards or F-7 REPORTING LIMITS <br /> • surrogates.have completely vaporized before aliquots are taken. Droplets of liquid <br /> standards or surrogates can adhere to the internal surface of the bags or bulbs. This The appropriate RLs to be used on a specific project should be based on the project <br /> practice is not recommended because of the inherent difficulty in preparing the data quality objectives(DQOs)taking into consideration various factors. The project <br /> surrogates or standards. Commercially prepared surrogates or standards should be manager and the parties involved with the project should consider factors such as: <br /> used. Due to variations with where and when the surrogates are added to the soil sampling protocols,analytical method(s)to be used list of target compounds and other <br /> gas samples,laboratories are advised to note in their final analytical reports the exact DQO need for risk assessment. <br /> step in the process where the surrogates(if used)are added so the results can be <br /> evaluated accordingly. Table F-4 delineates the reporting limits of the common soil gas analytical techniques. <br /> The ranges in this table are based on the survey of analytical laboratories conducted by <br /> • Reporting Limit Verification:The Reporting Limit(RL)is defined as the limit of the Soil Gas Advisory Workgroup. For the reporting limits of other methods/techniques, <br /> quantification reported by the analyzing laboratory. The RL should not be lower than consult with the analytical laboratory. <br /> the lowest calibration point. The RL should be validated periodically(recommended <br /> 12/10/2009 -83- 12/10/2009 -84- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.