My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AMERICAN
>
820
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536718
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2018 7:14:07 PM
Creation date
11/1/2018 2:52:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0536718
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0021094
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER SIEBOLD CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
820
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AMERICAN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14729211
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
820 S AMERICAN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(8) Vapor distribution and migration (2) The number and location of initial sampling points in potential source <br /> (9) Unique site features. areas and areas with known contamination.The rationale for the number, <br /> location and depth of sampling points selected should be provided. <br /> The CSM is a dynamic and iterative tool,and is meant to be updated as new (3) A clear statement as to whether permanent or temporary vapor wells are <br /> information becomes available. Therefore,it should be revised after each stage to be installed,and the rationale for making that decision. <br /> of the investigation. <br /> (4) A clear statement as to whether a mobile and/or stationary laboratory will <br /> To identify sources,potential release mechanism(s)and pathway(s)for vapor be used when samples are collected,and the rationale for making that <br /> migration,collect some or all of the following information: decision. Note that non-specific portable organic vapor analyzers and/or <br /> gas chromatograph(GC)-based handheld detectors should not be used <br /> • soil types ` for quantification during a soil gas investigation. As of the date of this . <br /> • subsurface geology document,a laboratory certification program is in progress Once <br /> • hydrogeology(local and regional)including groundwater Flow,direction certification program is available by the California Department of Health <br /> • subsurface heterogeneity Services,laboratories should apply for a certification program as soon as <br /> • groundwater quality data possible. <br /> • regional groundwater Flow direction <br /> • well records (5) A schematic diagram of the well design and a cross-section of the site <br /> • boring logs showing the major lithologic units and zones for vapor monitoring should <br /> • surficial features of the area,such as ground cover and surface water be included in the workplan(see Figures 1 and 2). <br /> bodies. <br /> (6) A clear statement as to how to prevent infiltration of surface runoff with <br /> A cross-sectional diagram or equivalent depicting a three-dimensional concept of contaminates into the vadose zone,groundwater,and the monitoring <br /> points. <br /> the site may be helpful in demonstrating and understanding site dynamics. <br /> Examples of features to include for the three-dimensional conceptual model (7) q clear statement to how unauthorized access to the permanent <br /> include the items listed above as well as: <br /> • point of source entry into the vadose zone monitoring pointswill be prevented,for example,by a locking subsurface <br /> • primary and secondary source location and depths <br /> utility vault) <br /> • vertical profiling of lithologic changes down to the first occurrence of (8) Considerations for sampling frequency pursuant to the DQOs established <br /> groundwater for each site. <br /> • location of above ground buildings and receptors relative to the source. <br /> (9) Procedures for properly installing soil gas sampling points. The <br /> Elements of the Workplan workplan should provide sufficient details concerning installation of <br /> •Provide details of the study design in the Workplan,which include: sampling points based on known site conditions. <br /> (10) Procedures to properly decommission monitoring vapor wells that are no <br /> (1) A scaled site map which identifies proposed sampling points,with longer needed. The decommissioning activity should achieve an effective <br /> locations and coordinates of identifiable geographic landmarks,such as and long-term seal of subsurface geologic materials and prevent cross- <br /> street center-line,benchmarks,street intersection,and wells. The site contamination in the subsurtace, <br /> map should also include the known or inferred extent of contamination <br /> as well as,pertinent features that represent potential or known areas of (11) A health and safety plan for the project. <br /> concern. Examples of pertinent features include existing or former <br /> sumps,trenches,drains,sewer lines,clarifiers,septic systems,piping, <br /> and locations of ASTs,USTs,and chemical or waste management 2.1 Field Activities <br /> units. <br /> The project proponent should notify the regulating agency 10 working days prior <br /> 3/3/2010 -13- 3/3/2010 -14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.