Laserfiche WebLink
residual vacuum in the SUMMA'canister of less than 10 inches Haq,which APPENDIX E <br /> corresponded to a sample volume of about 0.6 Lin a 1-1-SUMMA canister(i.e.,two <br /> aliquots of sample would be required). For a low-Flow probe the volume of soil gas NAPHTHALENE SOIL GAS COLLECTION <br /> extracted from the formation is known from the permeability testing and from the volume <br /> expected to be collected based on the Ideal Gas Law(i.e.,0.33 L,excluding the dead <br /> volume of above ground tubing). Therefore,sample collection into canisters that do not Soil gas sampling for naphthalene is more complex than traditional soil gas investigation <br /> exceed the maximum applied vacuum(100 inches of water)can be collected If the procedures. The appropriate sample collection approach for naphthalene is USEPA <br /> sample collection time(3 minutes)is not exceeded with a calibrated Flow of 100 ml/min. Method TO-17,requires the use of sorbent tubes(USEPA,1999). Soil gas <br /> investigators should select an appropriate sorbent material pursuant to the physical <br /> Additional Testing Prior to SoU Gas Sampling:Passive soil gas survey can be properties of the subsurface contaminant along with the appropriate applied vacuum, <br /> performed to determine whether active soil gas samples are required at specific sampling Flow rate,and sampling volume. Soil gas workplans should describe haw the <br /> location(s)or throughout the site with low-permeability soil. The passive soil gas field investigation will meet all the requirements within this advisory as well as those <br /> sampling method is described in Appendix A. Other guidance documents recommend noted in Method TO-17. <br /> passive sampling method in low-permeability soil for site characterization purpose <br /> (USEPA 2008,Page 13). Both passive and active soil gas samples may need to be collected in order to provide <br /> multiple lines of evidence to evaluate vapor intrusion exposure to naphthalene, <br /> The trademarks and brand names mentioned in this appendix is not an endorsement of Quantification of the contaminant source term is critical for risk-based decision making. <br /> a specific product but is provided as an example to the reader as a reference to what Repetitive soil gas sampling from permanent points may be warranted as soil gas grab <br /> instrument or material was successfully used in the past. Other products,which meet samples approach risk-based concentrations. Long-term monitoring may be needed,in <br /> the similar standards and quality as the above mention products may be acceptable. a fashion similar to groundwater,to ascertain representative subsurface concentrations <br /> and to document contaminant plume stability. <br /> References: - <br /> Sampling System Materials - <br /> API,2005:American Petroleum Institute.Collecting and interpreting soil-gas samples <br /> from the vadose zone:A practical strategy for assessing the subsurface vapor-lo-indoor Sorbent/Method TO-17 is recommended for confirmation sampling and analysis for <br /> air migration pathway at petroleum hydrocarbon sites. Publication 8 4741.Washington, naphthalene in soil gas at probe locations where this chemical was previously detected <br /> D.C.:API. by another soil gas method such as EPA Methods 503018260B or TO-15 or in the soil <br /> matrix samples. Naphthalene analysis by EPA MethodTO-15 presents several <br /> Johnson,P.C.,M.W.Kemblowski,and J.D.Colthart, 1990. Quantitative Analysis for challenges,such as contaminant carryover and variability in recovery(Hayes et al., <br /> the Cleanup of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils by In-situ Soil Venting. Ground Water, 2005). EPA Method TO-15 defines target analytes as having a vapor pressure greater <br /> 28(3):413-429. than 0.1 mmHg at 25°C at 1 atmosphere,and is suitable for organic compounds with <br /> McAlary,T.A.,P,.Nicholson,H.Groenevelt,D.Bertrand.2009."A Case Study of Soil- carbon content ranging from C3 to C10. However,naphthalene with vapor pressure of <br /> Gas Sampling in Silt Clay-Rich(Low-Permeability)Soils%Ground Water Monitoring 0.087 mm Hg falls just below this threshold for TO-15. USEPA Method TO-17 allows <br /> &Remediation,29, No.1,Winter 2009,pp.144. greater flexibility in targeting lower vapor pressure compounds,and hydrophobic <br /> sorbents,such as Tenax TA or GR which baps organic compounds ranging from C7 to <br /> USEPA 2008 United State Environmental Protection Agency Brownfields Technology C20 have been demonstrated to perform well when sampling heavier molecular weight <br /> Primer Vapor Intrusion Considerations for Develooment EPA 542-R-08-001 VOCs(or SVOCs)such as naphthalene(Fortune,A.at al,2008). Data from samples <br /> blip llwww.brownfieldstsc ora collected in sorbent and analyzed using TO-17 for naphthalene are reliable,provided <br /> that the requisite volume of soil gas passes through the sorbent tube. A maximum <br /> applied vacuum of 100 inches of water or less with an appropriate flow rate(e.g., <50 <br /> mUmin)derived from the soil gas permeability testing(McAlary,T.et al,2009)should <br /> allow the sampler to collect the requisite soil gas volume. <br /> Some stationary laboratories are capable of obtaining data of acceptable quality using <br /> SUMMA'/EPA Method TO-15, If EPA Method TO-15 is used for sampling and analysis <br /> 12/10/2009 -63- 12/10/2009 -64- <br />