Laserfiche WebLink
} <br /> iF <br /> F <br /> Table 2 <br /> Analytical Results ii <br /> Soil Samples Beneath UST9,..'.July 1998 <br />+: (mglkg) <br /> r <br /> 64 ,B•2 BA B-S <br /> BTEX ND ljND NO NO <br /> Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND IND ; ND ND <br /> Diesel Hydrocarbons NO !!ND 2.47 NO <br /> i <br /> MTBEND liND NO NO <br /> VOCs J . NO I iIND ND ND <br />{ <br /> 4.5 Waste Oil/Motor Oil Tank Filler Samples <br /> i URSGWC was directed by SJCPHS-EHD to collect sampjles from the pea gravel at the fillet <br /> to these tanks; Samples S-SWC}-01-01 (waste oil tank) andli S-SMO-01-01 were therefore <br /> collected. The waste oil tank sample was found to contain diesel hydrocarbons at 5.73 mg/kg, <br /> indicating that some spillage had occurred during filling. <br /> 4.6 Discussion of Results <br /> As previously mentioned, the USTs at the site were sitting on top,'jof.a 1-foot-thick concrete pad <br /> that could not be removed or sampled beneath at the time of the UST removal (see Appendix B, <br /> Photographs). Consequently,only piping and dispenser sarriples and soil stockpile samples could <br /> be collected-at the time of the UST removal, as directed by the SJCPHS-EHD representative. At <br /> the time of the removal, the SJCPHS-EHD representative recommended that the USPS submit a <br /> plan of action within 30 days, outlining how the soil samples would be collected from beneath <br /> the concrete pad. These samples were subsequently collected from beneath the concrete pad as <br /> outlined in Section 3.2.1. <br /> URSGWC considers the native soil under the USTs to have been adequately characterized by the <br />' four samples collected (13-1, B-2, B-4, B-5), which included samples from beneath both the <br /> unleaded gasoline and diesel tanks. The low-level diesel detection of 2.47 mg/kg (sample B4, <br /> under the unleaded gasoline tank) is not consistent with leakages of the diesel tank, since the <br /> samples under the diesel tank were non-detect for diesel and the other analytes (samples B-2 and <br /> B-5). Furthermore,none of the samples had any detects for TPH, BTEX or MTBE. The absence <br /> of leaking from the tanks is further supported by the results of;`the stockpiled soil sampling, <br /> which showed only one low-level diesel detection of 1.81 mg/kg, and the condition of the tanks <br /> upon removal. <br /> twktan VMF Construction 4luervation RWrt July Z7,.1999 <br /> Pose 9 <br /> i G -d [V0C-CN VN]Cvs 'd slit/ 0.Mv AV01 Nd11"0 0001 .1 . q8j. <br />