Laserfiche WebLink
Stacy Rivera [EH] <br /> From: Rehor, Mike W. <mrehor@pactiv.com> <br /> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 2:41 PM <br /> To: Stacy Rivera [EH] <br /> Cc: Frese,Jeff J.; Christopherson, Aaron M.; Rogers, Glenn <br /> Subject: RE: Waste Inspection of Pactiv Packaging Stockton Qantas -June 8, 2015 - REQUESTED <br /> FOLLOW-UP <br /> Stacy—we did complete the testing that I outlined below. <br /> We are currently reviewing all of the testing results, and will provide you a summary of our sampling and results this <br /> Friday, as promised. <br /> Let me know if you have any questions in the meantime. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Mike Rehor <br /> Director, Environmental Health &Safety <br /> Pactiv LLC <br /> 1900 W. Field Court, Lake Forest, IL 60045 <br /> 847-482-2675 (o)847-915-0665 (c) <br /> 847-615-6516 (fax) <br /> mrehor@pactiv.com <br /> From: Rehor, Mike W. <br /> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:35 PM <br /> To: 'srivera@sjcehd.com' <br /> Cc: Frese, Jeff J.; Christopherson, Aaron M.; Rogers, Glenn <br /> Subject: RE: Waste Inspection of Pactiv Packaging Stockton Qantas - June 8, 2015 - REQUESTED FOLLOW-UP <br /> Stacy—I did visit the Stockton Qantas facility this week. Below is our response to your two questions: <br /> 1. Metal Grinds—why are they being managed as non-RCRA waste? <br /> Pactiv Response—The metal fines/grinds generated at the Pactiv Stockton Qantas facility are currently being <br /> managed as a RCRA Hazardous Waste (see attached photo). We are working on testing the fines to confirm this <br /> waste classification, and/or determine if reclassification is possible. However, until such time as a <br /> reclassification is made, the metal fines will continue to be managed as a RCRA Hazardous Waste. <br /> 2. Liquid Ink Waste—why was it not sampled at the point of generation? <br /> Pactiv Response—As stated in our response to your inspection findings, Pactiv believes that the mop water and <br /> the waste ink rinse water(in buckets), along with the wash tanks, are all the same waste (now referred to <br /> consistently as"ink wash water"). All of this waste is generated from the same process—washing ink off of <br /> various press parts and components using soapy water. The ink is all the same water-based inks, the same soap <br /> is used for washing, and the water/soap mixture is similar for all processes(10-20%soap). Therefore, we think <br /> our waste characterization testing to date has been representative of the point of generation, as the ink wash <br /> water initially generated at the press or"OPMR" room would be similar to the stored ink wash water awaiting <br /> disposal. <br /> t <br />