Laserfiche WebLink
Marley Cooling Tower Company i. <br />Groundwater Treatment System <br />San Joaquin County <br />Inspection Report <br />�J February 7, 2003 <br />development (SPWN); and wildlife habitat (WILD). Industrial process supply (PRO) and industrial service <br />supply (IND) are identified as a potential beneficial uses. <br />Spill Chronology <br />A detailed chronology is included at the end of this report. On Tuesday morning, September 17, 2002, the <br />treatment plant operator, Mr. Jim Lingo arrived to find that the effluent pH meter signal was sending a constant <br />and false "low pH" signal to the pH adjustment pumps. Copies of the "Water Plant Performance Log" <br />provided to us by MCTC representative Mr. David Lieb indicate that the low pH signal was reading 2.79, and <br />was first noted at 7:07 am. This false pH signal in turn caused the caustic pH adjustment pump to continuously <br />operate despite the fact that the actual pH level was not low. Moreover, because the meter signal was "frozen" <br />and sending a false "low pH" signal, it did not activate the system shutdown feature as it was designed to do. <br />According to Mr. Lieb and Mr. Lingo, it is not known how long the meter signal was "frozen", but the earliest <br />that it could have malfunctioned would have been around 10:00 pm on the night of September 16'h, 2002. <br />Therefore, it is possible that the erroneous pH adjustments could have been occurring for at least 9 hours. <br />Upon noting the malfunction, MCTC immediately shut the plant down, and undertook measures to correct this <br />condition. Repairs made by resetting and recalibrating the pH probe and meter. Additionally, the caustic pump <br />was replaced. The system was restored and operating within permit conditions at approximately 7:OOpm <br />September 17, 2002. MCTC personnel did not visit the outfall or the Canal at that time to assess any impacts <br />to the receiving water. MCTC also did not notify any regulatory agencies, including us, that a malfunction had <br />occurred at the treatment plant and that a spill had occurred. <br />DeltaKeeper received a report, via telephone message, from a concerned citizen about the fish kill on the <br />evening of Wednesday, September 18, 2002. On Thursday, September 19, 2002 Ms. Kan Morgan, the <br />DeltaKeeper Monitoring Coordinator, visited the site and performed field measurements in the canal, including <br />pH measurements. Later that same day, at approximately 1:30 pm Ms. Morgan notified the DFG. Warden Lori <br />Oldfather responded to the call. Using the field measurements and field observations, Ms. Morgan land Warden <br />Oldfather were able to trace the point source to the MCTC outfall. A summary of DeltaKeeper's field <br />measurements is provided in Table 1. <br />Table 1: Summary of DeltaKeeper's Field Measurements <br />Date(Time) <br />Sample Location in the Stockton Diverting Canal <br />pH <br />9/19/2002 <br />Beneath Highway 99 at Waterloo Road. Approximately 8,500 feet <br />10.82 <br />12:54 m <br />downstream of the outfall. <br />9/19/02 <br />West of Railroad Bridge, at weir. Approximately 6,600 feet <br />10.58 <br />1:40 m <br />downstream of the outfall. <br />9/19/2002 <br />At outfall. <br />8.96 <br />(3:45 m <br />9/19/2002 <br />Unknown distance upstream from the outfall. <br />8.01 <br />4:42 m <br />3 <br />Approved: <br />