Laserfiche WebLink
S. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING <br /> Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ <br /> Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ <br /> Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer E Industry Standard ❑Professional Engineer <br /> ❑Other(Specify) <br /> Test Method Used: ❑Pressure ❑Vacuum E Hydrostatic <br /> ❑Other(Specify) <br /> Test Equipment Used: Incon Sump Tester Equipment Resolution: +/_0.002" <br /> Fill Sump u 87 Fill Sump 4 91 <br /> Sump Diameter: 42" 42" <br /> Sump Depth; 52" 53" <br /> Height from Tank Top to Top of 1$" 16" <br /> Highest Piping Penetration: _ _ <br /> Height from Tank Top to Lowest 22" 19" <br /> Electrical Penetration: NOV 2 0 2017 <br /> Condition of sump prior to Good Good <br /> testing: <br /> Portion of Sump Tested 2"above piping 2"above piping ENVIRON IENTAL <br /> Sum Material: Fiberglass Fiber lass DE APIMENT <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/water and 30 minutes 30 minutes <br /> starting test: <br /> Test Start Time: 11:36 am 11:53 am <br /> Initial Reading(R,): 4.0112 2.1134 <br /> Test End Time: 11:51 am 12:0$ pm <br /> Final Readin Rr): 4.0108 2.1133 <br /> Test Duration: 15 min. 15 min. <br /> Change in Reading(R,-Rr): 0.0004 0.0001 <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.002" +/-0.002" <br /> Test Result: ® Pass ❑Fail ® Pass ❑Fail <br /> Is there a sensor in the sump? E Yes ❑No E Yes ❑No <br /> Does the sensor alarm when <br /> either product or water is ❑ Yes❑No E NA ❑Yes❑No E NA <br /> detected? <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? E Yes❑No❑NA E Yes❑No❑NA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and Eyes❑No❑ NA EYes❑No❑ NA <br /> verified functional after testing? <br /> Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up forfailed tests) <br /> Sensor functionality was not confirmed.This procedure is not part of the Secondary Containment testing scope of work <br /> F <br />