Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> Testing Company Name: LEMESNAGER ENGINEERING Phone No.:(619)917-8001 x <br /> Site Address: 3807 CORONADO City STOCKTON Zip 95204 Date of <br /> Testing/Servicing:2007-11-26 <br /> UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK MONITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing Permit Number: <br /> Software Version Installed:421.00 <br /> Complete the follo ng checklist: <br /> ® Yes I ❑ No* Is the audible alarm o erational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes 0 No* Were all sensors visual) inspected,functional) tested,and confirmed o ersition l? <br /> 2 Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation'? <br /> ❑ Yes [I No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> ® NIA operational? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ® NIA monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? if yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ❑Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failureldisconnection? ❑ Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> ® NIA mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fillpoint(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br /> ❑ Yes* 0 No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ElYes* ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) D <br /> Product; © Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> 1� Yes ❑ No* Was monitoriniz system set-up reviewed to ensure proper setting s?Attach set u2 reports, if applicable <br /> ® Yes Q No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: NOTE: Annular for IOK underground tank is a brine filled system. <br /> Remote monitoring consists of tank level readings ONLY by BME in Kansas City.There is no remote monitor of alarm conditions. The <br /> inspector requests either a daily log of tank monitor alarms OR remote monitoring of alarms. <br /> The 5K AST tank incorporates underground piping, approx. 3040 ft. between tank and generator. There is a piping sump at the end of <br /> the AST.The secondary containment piping is not visible at the penetration fittings in the piping sump. <br /> A I hour visual hydrostatic test was performed on the tank fill overspill bucket. <br /> DEH:HM-9301 (Rev 06107106) County of San Diego-DEH-Hazardous Materials Division <br />