Laserfiche WebLink
` I <br /> rSWRCB, January 2002 page - of <br /> 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer ❑Industry Standard ❑Professional Engineer <br /> - - v <br /> ❑Other(Sped ) <br /> Test Method Used: ❑PressureVacuum 11Hydrostatic <br /> ❑Other(Specify) <br /> Test Equipment Used: °r/rrrl/t+ ; a ;rte/;rr• _. { r r r -': Equipment Resolution: <br /> Tank#I Tank# Z Tank # 3 Tank <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' ❑Yes ANo ❑Yes '9'igo ❑Yes No �� ❑Yes ❑No <br /> Tank Capacity: Zv!t— / 7 13-3 67i 1w s 116.2 7 <br /> s�/�<•s� s <br /> Tank Material: f r / ; <br /> Tank Manufacturer: l rt,� , r ..} C" �r <br /> Product Stored: P ( P fie 4- r. <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuo ater and <br /> startingtest: 1 �+ i u ✓ ru r ( uur <br /> Test Start Time: /l.' l 1/.' ! 5� l.' 15— <br /> Initial <br /> 5— <br /> Initial Reading(R,): — to f� — I,� !tt r .. /t.J 1 ? <br /> Test End Time: l_ 15— / / " (5— <br /> Final <br /> SFinal Reading(RF): <br /> Test Duration: �2- Z1 a u, <br /> Change in Reading(RF-R,): 1, fr t' ` l t 1 /t q <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 11-10 L055 :�, 1 tc. �nJ le 55 t t 1v'�' L5f F� 14 . <br /> Test Result: '0"Pass ❑ sil "1 Pass ❑Fail ;[pass 0 Fail Pass ❑ Fail <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? '191yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑Yes ,1 o ❑NA D/Yes ❑No ❑' A <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and <br /> verified functional after testing? fAles ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No PNA ❑Yes ❑No,IATA /�Yes ❑No ❑ <br /> l <br /> Comments— (include information on repairs madeprior to testing, and recommended allow-u for ailed tests) <br /> ' Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment,such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br /> testing. {California Code of Regulations,Title 23, Section 2637(x)(6)} <br />