Laserfiche WebLink
to move it. " I said, "Joel, let me get this straight, your <br /> here because you don' t want Seibold' s credibility with the <br /> Health District to be damaged but at the same time your <br /> admitting an attempt to deceive the Health District?" Joel <br /> said, "Yes. " <br /> The removal was then rescheduled and took place on April 3, <br /> 1989. No violations were noted. Four soil samples were <br /> collected, two from the excavation, one from the pipeline, <br /> and one From the dispensers original location. <br /> A letter was drafted to Seibold Corporation from the SJLHD <br /> on April 11 , 1989 noting the above events. A rebuttal <br /> letter was written by Wendt of Seibold Corp. on April 19, <br /> 1989 and received by this office on April 20, 1989. On <br /> April 21, 1989 the preliminary laboratory results from the <br /> above removal were submitted to the SJLHD. The dispenser <br /> sample, number D-1, revealed petroleum related contamination <br /> of 12 parts per million (PPM) total volatile petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons, 22 PPM lead, . 31 PPM benzene, 2. 9 PPM toluene, <br /> . 98 PPM ethyl benzene, and 5. 7 PPM xylene. <br /> On April 28, 1989, a reexcavation workplan was submitted to <br /> the SJLHD from Seibold Corporation for the contamination <br /> under the dispenser location at 820 S. American Street, <br /> Stockton. <br />