COMPLIANCE INFO_2013 - 2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 0 October 7, 2016 Stacy Rivera, Senior REHS San Joaquin County EHD 1868 Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95205 Dear Inspector Rivera, Thank you for your visit to our location on August 18 & September 9, 2016. During your visit, you brought a few items to aur attention. We have noted each issue below with our plan to address them. In addition, please seethe attached documentation. 11 Alleged Violation (m): CCR 2712(6) Failed to maintain alarm logs and/or records of follow up actions: Maintenance and monitoring records for the lost three years were not found on site. Response: The site was compliant according to CCR 2712 (b) which states "written monitoring and maintenance records shall be maintained on-site or off-site at a readily available location". These records shall be made available, upon request within 36 hours, to the local agency. Our gas station and warehouse have one location address: 2440 Daniels St. According to the manager Martin Turley and attendant Stacy Rodriguez who walked with the inspector: the inspector did not request or ask for the records to be produced. All records kept in the warehouse are considered "on site", and are currently up-to-date. 2) Alleged Violation (201)• CCR 2712(b) Failed to maintain alarm logs and/or records of follow up actions: The missing records include responses to the following alarms: U (91 Annular) High Liquid alarm - 7/31/16 Response: The Annular High Liquid Alarm from 7/31/16 was recorded on the Alarm Log. FMS responded to the shutdown by dispatching Alltech. However; the alarm cleared by itself before Alltech could arrive on site that Sunday morning. That detail was summarized as "FMS monitoring". 31 Alleged Violation (201): CCR 2712(b) Failed to maintain alarm logs and/or records of follow up actions: S11 (87A Vent Vacuum) Communication alarm - 7/22/16 and S31 (87A Vent Vacuum) Communication alarm - 7/20/16 Response: The Designated Operator (DO) (Belshire) noted both alarms 511 (87A Vent Vacuum) 7/22/16 and 7/20/16 Communication alarms on page 2 of the Designated Underground 5tgrage Tank (UST) Operator Monthly Visual Inspection checklist dated 08/05/16 on page 2 of the checklist (see below). In addition, the DO stated the alarm was an isolated event. This was documented and emailed to Gilbarco for confirmation and verification that the sensors were working properly on August 8, 2016. Gilbarco responded August 8, 2016, confirming that sensors were functioning properly that same day. The 511 (87A Vent Vacuum) Communication Alarm on 7/22/16 was recorded on the Alarm History Report by the Gas Station Attendant on 7/22/16. (See attached documentation Alarm History July 2016). This was also an isolated event confirmed by Gilbarco. In addition, the alarm cleared within seconds and no documentation was printed or spooled from the Veeder—Root on 7/20/16 for the Gas Station Attendant at the site (2440 Daniels St.) to record. All steps were followed according to CCF 2712(6); it was impossible to log alarm which cleared in seconds and no spooling of paperwork. Again this was a unique alarm backed by verification from Gilbarco of alarm time and length of alarm. DO complied to CCR 2712(b) with follow-up to verifying unit was functioning.