My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSTALL_2008
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DANIELS
>
2440
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0527629
>
INSTALL_2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2023 10:58:43 AM
Creation date
11/4/2018 2:50:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
INSTALL
FileName_PostFix
2008
RECORD_ID
PR0527629
PE
2351
FACILITY_ID
FA0018721
FACILITY_NAME
Costco Wholesale #1031
STREET_NUMBER
2440
STREET_NAME
DANIELS
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2440 DANIELS ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\D\DANIELS\2440\PR0527629\INSTALL 2008.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
397
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 0 <br />Muniappa Naidu [EH] Page 1 of 2 <br />From: Mary Rose Holtz [rholtz@a Barghausen.comj <br />Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 10:51 AM <br />To: Muniappa Naidu [EH] <br />Cc: Harley Mattson; File <br />Subject: Costco Gasoline, Manteca, CA - CUPA Comments - BCE #12919 <br />Mr. Naidu, <br />According to a conversation you had with David Painter of our office, it is my understanding you have <br />the following concerns with the Manteca, California Costco gasoline site. i have included the <br />comments, followed by my responses in RED, <br />1. Why are we putting a single float in the tank annular? The site is a wet site. <br />It is our standard specification to include a single float in the tank annul, r. If you squire a <br />dual float, I will modify our plans to indicate such. Please advise. vW/J (_ca_ . <br />2. Sheet T1, Note 913: Muni doesn't understand why we would specify "30 minutes" for the test; <br />his experience is the lines would be pressurized and held there for a significant length of time— <br />maybe 24 hours. <br />This note has been modified to read: B. TANKS AND PRIMARY PIPING <br />HYDROSTATICALLY OR PNEUMATICALLY TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH <br />MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES. <br />3. Sheet T1, Note 12: This is possibly semantics, but he believes the note should more clearly <br />read, "Prior to fuel being dropped" or "Prior to first fill" rather than "Prior to fuel being pumped." <br />This note has been modified to indicate, "Prior to first fill". <br />4. On Sheet T1, the note on the tank profile says with a 2" level sensed, a 72 hour window would <br />start before shut down. With a 5" level sensed, there would be an immediate shutdown. Muni <br />understood there should be a shutdown immediately with a 2" level sensed. <br />This note is what Costco desires, If you will require a shutdown immediately with a 2" level <br />sensed, I will modify our plans to indicate such. Please advise. ,�- <br />Dyi 1 rot ted by th��fL, <br />5. Sheet T2, Detail D: Muni believes if the fiberglass pipe is exposed, and only protected by the <br />20 mil wrap, the first time the wrap is damaged, the pipe will start to degrade and will become ft <br />porous and problematic very soon. I think he was looking for completely buried fiberglass or �,, <br />greater protection than the wrap, <br />To alleviate concern, I have added a vent transition sump on the plans giving greater <br />protection to the vent piping. <br />6. Sheet T2: Guidance Letter from the State Water Res. Board LG -150-1 stipulates (or perhaps <br />suggests) that the ball float level and tank gauge full indication should be the same. We have <br />the ball float at 95% and the tank gauge at 90%. <br />According to LG -150-2 (supersedes LG -150-1), The UST Overfill Prevention Requirements, <br />Option A indicates that the overfill prevention system alerts the transfer operator when the <br />tank is 90 percent full by restricting the flow into the tank OR triggering an audible and visual <br />alarm and does not allow for manual override. This option allows for the use of one of two <br />methods. We use option 2) External (audible and visual) alarm which alerts the delivery <br />operator when the UST is 90 percent full. As a design back-up, we install a ball float at 95 <br />percent in addition to the methods indicated by the UST Overfill Prevention Requirements. <br />Please note that your immediate response is required for comments 1 and 4. Also, will you be requiring <br />a formal letter outlining the responses to your comments as well as revised plans for your review. If <br />you require plans, how many sets will you require, <br />Your immediate attention to this issue would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please <br />feel free to contact me at this office. <br />Thank you, <br />Mary Rose Holtz <br />12/11/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.