My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2004 - 2006
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DUCK CREEK
>
3633
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232461
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2004 - 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2020 4:40:07 PM
Creation date
11/4/2018 3:40:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2004 - 2006
RECORD_ID
PR0232461
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003758
FACILITY_NAME
RYDER TRUCK RENTAL #1071
STREET_NUMBER
3633
STREET_NAME
DUCK CREEK
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
17331001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3633 DUCK CREEK DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\D\DUCK CREEK\3633\PR0232461\COMPLIANCE INFO 2004 - 2006.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2004 - 2006
QuestysRecordDate
4/25/2018 10:46:56 PM
QuestysRecordID
3869444
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' t 0itoring System Certification • <br />Site Address: 3633 DUCK CREEK DRIVE Date of Testing/Service: 02/24/2006 <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: <br />Complete the following checklist: <br />X Yes <br />No' <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />❑X Yes <br />No' <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />❑X Yes <br />No' <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />❑X Yes <br />❑ Na' <br />Were all sensors Installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not <br />interfere with their proper operation? <br />X Yes <br />No' <br />n NiA <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? <br />Ex Yes <br />❑ No' <br />❑ N/A <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive <br />shut -down? (check all that apply) ❑x Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑X Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑X Yes El No <br />Q Yes <br />O No' <br />❑ N/A <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e.: no mechanical <br />overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s) and operating <br />property? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? so <br />❑X Yes' <br />❑ No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br />manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />❑ Yes' <br />Q No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (check all that apply) ❑ Product; <br />❑ Water. If yes, descdbe causes in Section E, below. <br />QX Yes <br />No' <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if applicable. <br />IX Yes <br />❑ No' <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers' specifications? <br />' In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Page 2 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.