Laserfiche WebLink
Sep 09 04 02: 23p Mika Dotten [2001 533-2650 <br /> p. 2 <br /> Facility Fame: Tracy Costco 658 (Page 2) <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> Software Version Installed:324.0 <br /> Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? Deafening? Outside Alarm) <br /> ®'Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is the print function operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors-.risually in ed,functionally testa and continned operational? <br /> Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary contaimnent and positioned so that other equipment <br /> will not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> ❑ NIA operational? <br /> Z Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> [] NIA monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors initiate <br /> positive shutdown? (Check all that apply) ® Sump Sensors; ®Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shutdown due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ® Yes, ❑No. <br /> ®Yes ❑No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device, is the overfill <br /> ❑ N/A warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? At what percent of tank <br /> capacity does the alarm trigger? 90% <br /> ❑Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment <br /> replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section L below. <br /> ❑Yes* 0 No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑Product;❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ®Yes © No* I Was monitorin&system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports, if applicable <br /> ®Yes © No* I Is all monitoring ui ment operational per manufacturer's s eeifications? <br /> E. Comments: Replaced L2, the liquid sensor in the Regular tank #1 fill sump due to a failure of the high <br /> float. <br /> In addition, all discriminating sensors were tested using the following test procedure to insure complete <br /> operation of the tri-state discriminating sensor: <br /> 1. The sensor is submerged V in water to test the lower float. A liquid alarm is detected without positive <br /> shutoff. <br /> 2. The sensor is submerged completely in water. A high liquid or fuel alarm is detected. Positive shutoff <br /> occurs. <br /> 3. The sensor is removed from the water and dipped (one inch) in gasoline while the resistance readings <br /> are monitored on the Veeder-Root. The fuel alarm will be detected and positive shutoff will occur. <br /> No Other Deficiencies. The facility is in compliance. <br />