My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2002 - 2007
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
16
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231136
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2002 - 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2019 4:53:11 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 1:42:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2002 - 2007
RECORD_ID
PR0231136
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003610
FACILITY_NAME
A&A GAS & FOOD MART
STREET_NUMBER
16
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
13902001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
16 E HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification <br />Site Address: <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: <br />Complete the Mllnwino rherkliet- <br />Date of Testing/Servicing: <br />x In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected_ <br />E. Comments: W 4 'Te /- / &) 9 7 1'(-4 r-,;-, .=1 ct : ' e of ej, I S k <br />❑ No* <br />Is the audible alarm rational? <br />p No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />[!rYes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors -visually impected. functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />es <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment <br />will not interfere with their proper ration? <br />❑ Yes❑ <br />lea* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br />Q,1N/A <br />operational? <br />es <br />p No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />❑ N/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is plectrically disconnect ed?1 yes: which sensors <br />initiate -Am? <br />positive shut -do (Check all that apply) Sump/Trench Sensors; C9 -Dispenser Containment <br />Sensors. <br />Did confirm due leaks failureldisconnection? <br />you positive shut -down to and sensor Yes; p No. <br />[ 'Yes <br />❑ No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />❑ N/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill int(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? ????% `tom <br />❑ Yes* <br />o <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment <br />replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for an replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />90�es* <br />❑ No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry- systems? (Check all that apply) <br />❑ Product, ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Was monitoring em set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? <br />❑ Yes <br />p No* <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's cations? <br />x In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected_ <br />E. Comments: W 4 'Te /- / &) 9 7 1'(-4 r-,;-, .=1 ct : ' e of ej, I S k <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.