My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KASSON
>
26815
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0504912
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2021 1:44:38 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 3:22:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0504912
PE
2332
FACILITY_ID
FA0006402
FACILITY_NAME
BANTA CARBONA IRRIG DIST
STREET_NUMBER
26815
STREET_NAME
KASSON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
26815 KASSON RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KASSON\26815\PR0504912\COMPLIANCE INFO 1995 - 2007.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 1995 - 2007
QuestysRecordDate
2/14/2018 9:43:56 PM
QuestysRecordID
175370
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
State Water Resources Control Board, Claim No. 010900 Page 02 <br />05 March 1996 <br />3. The Banta-Carbona Irrigation District is not a farming <br />organization. If the District installed the tank many decades ago <br />and utilized it, then the tank would emphatically not have been <br />used for farming purposes and should not have been classified as a <br />farm tank. <br />4. If the UST was installed by predecessor owners, we still <br />are unable to determine its use. <br />5. We are aware that Ms. Diane Hinson, San Joaquin County <br />EHD representative, has also stated the UST purpose was for farm <br />use. It is fact that she has no proof of who installed the tank <br />nor how the fuel was used. Thus her comments and reports should <br />not alone be reason to reject this application for UST removal <br />reimbursement. The local fire department representative who was on <br />site during removal is also not able to state what the UST use was. <br />Simply stated, Mr. Deaner, the UST in question was tagged a <br />"farm tank" by persons who had neither knowledge nor proof of its <br />actual use. Nor does District staff know. Further, the UST was so <br />old there were no District records available that can show as fact <br />how it was used. Therefore, we believe rejection of our claim <br />under the above circumstances is without foundation and absent any <br />evidence to the contrary, again request reimbursement for its <br />removal by the State of California. <br />Please feel free to call after reviewing the above. We should <br />perhaps discuss the UST personally if there remains any uncertainty <br />as to its history. <br />Thank you. <br />SOs191�1 iion-eddbby/ <br />And ew W. Farrar <br />General Manager <br />cc: Mr. Gordon Boggs <br />California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />Central Valley Region <br />3443 Routier Road <br />Sacramento CA 958 -3098 <br />Ms. Diane Hinson <br />Sanas Joaquin Coun y EHD <br />P. O. Box 2009 <br />Stockton CA 95201 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.