Laserfiche WebLink
�.. <br /> SECTION 1 91 <br /> 1. Trace <br /> 2. ND(not detected) <br /> 3. Numerical value of MDL <br /> 4. A"less than"the numerical value of the MDL(BDL) <br /> 5. Zero <br /> 6. Some value between zero and the MDL,for example,half the MDL <br /> Y Actual measured value,even if below L <br /> 8. Actual measured value, MD <br /> parentheses Y <br /> followed b <br /> 9. Actual <br /> measured value with an estimate of precision,for example 2 t 4µg/L, <br /> where the estimate of error can be the MDL- <br /> Additional reporting forms are: <br /> 10. A number followed by Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration(EMPC) <br /> 11. Detected but less than MDL <br /> 12. Detected <br /> but less than PQ <br /> L <br /> ults in a real problem for some <br /> of the end <br /> The plethora of reporting techniques res <br /> users of the data. Those who wish to know whether their effluent is above or below a <br /> regulatory limit do not really care about the exact value of a pazazneter when it's on the <br /> I safe side;however other users,especially those who input the r el into <br /> mathematical 1 tter i I <br /> models for site assessments, are veryexactin in their data req <br /> applications"Not Detected" is quite different from a"Detected,but less than the MDL" or M <br /> "Below Detection Limits:' It is somewhat imperative for the laboratory to develop a <br /> dialog with the end user to determine the exact requirements of the data. <br /> Method detection limits(MDL)are the minimum level of an analyte that can be f ! <br /> determined with 99%confidence. Once an IDL has been determined,it is readily appar- <br /> ent that for samples that have target analyte present at the IDL, at least half the analyses S <br /> of the sample will result in responses below the IDL(Figure 1-21). The objective of the P' ' <br /> analyst becomes a determination of how high on the calibration curve one must go so that <br /> all signals will be above the IDL,in other words,no false negatives will be reported. <br /> n <br /> r <br /> The MDL attempts to answer this question. The procedure that follows b again drawn <br /> from EPA 40 CFR Part sw Appendix B. The analyst should consult the 40 CFR refer- <br /> ence,as th treoc dare a brief the mrelthod°sras follows:hoices that must be made during <br /> the MDL p <br /> I. Prepare a spike of the analyte into laboratory water that is very close(2 to 5 <br /> times)to the IDL obtained above. <br /> 2. Take seven aliquotes of this spiked solution and process each through the <br /> sample clean-up and preparation procedure. <br /> 3. Analyze each of the prepared aliquots in the exact same manner as Prescribed in it ! <br /> the Method used. <br /> 4. Calculate the standard deviation(S%R)of the aliquot results as described above. <br /> led t-statistic at a 99%v confidence level for the it <br /> $. The MDL is equal to the one-tin <br /> performed number of samples times the standard deviation: zc <br /> MDL=to.99,n x S%R or in this case MDL--3.143 S%R <br /> f <br /> a <br /> For other numbers of repetitions in the MDL study,the appropriate value of tp,99 can be <br /> found in Table 1-31. <br /> Genium Publishing Corporation <br />