Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> BOARD OF TRUSTEES SAN JOAQUIN LOCAL HEALTH DISIACT SERVING <br /> James Culbertson, Pres. <br /> Mary Anna Love,Vice Pres. 1601 East Hazelton Avenue, P.O. Boz 2009 City of Lodi <br /> Palricla E.Vannuccl,Sac'y. San Joaquin County <br /> j my S <br /> Joyce ca San Joaquin County <br /> Stockton, California 95201 <br /> Plmentel City of Escalon <br /> Virginia Mathews (209) 466-6781 City of Manteca <br /> Daniel L.Flores City of Ripon <br /> John D.Mast,M.D. City of Stockton <br /> Jogl Khanna,M.O.,M.P.H.,District Health Qfscer City of Tracy <br /> Gene S.Kraham <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> October 26 , 1987 <br /> cc:o: <br /> � . . <br /> Village Properties <br /> Scott Kepner <br /> 703 Market St . , Suite 1404 <br /> San Francisco, CA 95103 <br /> Re: Property at Ham & Lockeford, Lodi , CA <br /> On 3-3-87 four (4) underground fuel storage tanks were removed under permit <br /> and inspection by the San Joaquin Local Health District . Soil samples <br /> obtained and analyzed Uy Canonie Environmental Services indicated soil <br /> contamination was present under tank #2 and #4 at the following levels: <br /> Benzene Ethyl Benzene Toluene Xylene TPHC Total Lead <br /> Tank #1 ND ND ND ND <br /> Tank #2 ND ND ND ND <br /> Tank #3. ND ND ND ND ND 34Dpm <br /> 'Tank # ND ND ND ND <br /> 4. ND 68 Dpm 120 ppm 370 Ppm 3100 ppm ND <br /> (Source: Attached reports dated 4-1-87) <br /> Based upon the above test results further excavation and testing was <br /> necessary under tank #2 and tank #4, Contaminated soil to 16f feet from <br /> the surface beneath tank #2 was excavated and reportedly hauled to <br /> an approved disposal site. Contaminated soil to 16 feet from the surface <br /> beneath tank #4 was excavated and aerated on site for use as excavation <br /> fill . Resample results taken at the above identified depths under tank <br /> #2 and #4 were as follows: <br /> Benzene Ethyl Benzene Toluene Xylene TPHC Total Lead <br /> NA NA NA 2 .0 ppm <br /> Tank #4 ND ND ND ND 3.Oppm <br /> ND NA ND ND 47 ppm NA <br /> ND NA <br /> (Source: Attached reports dated 9-27-87) <br /> The above test results indicate that further subsurface site <br /> ( assessment under tank #2 and #4 are not required at this time. <br />