My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1997-2007
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
3550
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0505827
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1997-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:12 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 8:05:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1997-2007
RECORD_ID
PR0505827
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007030
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY PACIFIC HWY 99 CARDLOCK
STREET_NUMBER
3550
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
17916043
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3550 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\3550\PR0505827\COMPLIANCE INFO 1997-2007.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 1997-2007
QuestysRecordDate
6/21/2017 4:01:59 PM
QuestysRecordID
3452124
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Servicing• • <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Complete the f Ilowing checklist: <br /> WIs the audible alarm o erational? <br /> Is the visual alarm o rational? <br /> Were all sensors visual) ins ectedfunctional) tested, and confirmed o erational? <br /> Were al] sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment willnot interfere with their pro er operation? <br /> If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem)operational? <br /> For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ Yes ®No* monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> ❑N/A positive shut down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑ Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑No* For tank systes that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> CEI Yes m <br /> ®N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the over-fill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fillpoint(s)and operating ro erl ? If yes, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? _% <br /> ❑ Yes* ®No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors,probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br /> ® Yes* ❑No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑ Product; ® Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes ® No* Was—monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports, if applicable <br /> ❑ Yes ® No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> PRONTER NOT WORKING FOR ALARM HISTORY OR SET-UP <br /> UNABLE TO REVIEW SET-UP <br /> REGULAR STP SUMP SENSOR NOT WORKING <br /> WATER IN REGULAR STP SUMP;ABOUT 20 GALLONS <br /> MONITOR NOT PROGRAM14ED FOR SENSOR SHUT-DOWN <br /> Page.':of 3 <br /> Monitoring System Certification <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.