Laserfiche WebLink
xCB,January 2002 • • Page Z, of <br /> 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: 0 Tank Manufacturer ,<Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer <br /> 0 Other(Specify) <br /> Test Method Used: 0 Pressure �ff_Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic <br /> 0 Other(Specify) <br /> Test Equipment Used: i,tiIA Equipment Resolution: 30 <br /> Tank# J YZIDits!l Tank# Tank# Tank# <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' p Yes IiLNo 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No <br /> Tank Capacity: / 2 060 <br /> Tank Material: S (tel F2 P <br /> Tank Manufacturer: Y!>7 <br /> Product Stored: �S / <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/waterand <br /> starting test: <br /> Test Start Time: j •� y„ <br /> Initial Reading(Rt): <br /> Test End Time: V rh <br /> Final Reading(RF)`;: fh <br /> Test Duration: <br /> Change in Reading(RF-Ri): <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br /> Test Result: 'K Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass ❑Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass 0 Fail <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? XYes 0 No DNA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and <br /> verified functional after testin ? )KYes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA <br /> COMMents—(include information on re airs made ri)r to testing, and recommended follow-u jorfailed tests) <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum,are exempt from periodic containment <br /> testing. {California Code of Regulations,Title 23,Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />